Question:

LHC BLACK HOLE Question?

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

i heard they will produce black holes and they are supposed to evaporate in milli seconds and they are supposed to produce black holes continuously wouldnt that mean 1 black hole will 'eat' one and the others doing the same creating 1 BIG massive black hole 'eating' the earth?

 Tags:

   Report

9 ANSWERS


  1. Well.... no one really knows... but it's *possible*.   The thing is, a black hole is when there's too much mass in such a small volume, that Space can't support it.  

    The smaller a black hole is, the hotter it is - and it radiates faster.  The smallest blackholes would 'evaporate' right after being created - and their mass would be *so* small that they won't be able to attract each other before they release their mass in the form of energy.

    I hope.  


  2. Current theory is that small black holes would evaporate very quickly with a big explosion. But bigger black holes would suck stuff in and continue to get bigger.

    At present nobody knows any way of making black holes. There were probably some very small ones made in the Big Bang, but they evaporated long ago. Bigger ones are made when old stars collapse.  

  3. When black holes collide, they dont combine!!!!

  4. 11 dimensional string theory, (and 26 dimensional M theory), has not produced anything.

    It is possible that the extra 7 dimensions of space in string theory, (that are not perceived), are mathematical deception that first appeared with 5 dimensional Kaluza-Klein Theory.

    String theory is possibly deception involving adding dimensions of space to the already existing 3 dimensions of space one dimension at a time at 90 degree angles to the previous dimension.

    That string theory is possibly invalid is stated at the end of the wikipedia article on string theory.

  5. It would create an Einstein/Rosen bridge with the abyss at the center of our galaxy called Sagittarius A*. This wormhole could possibly let all sorts of extradimensional (spiritual) nightmares into this world. It could be used to explain a sudden appearance of Type III 'aliens'.

    Google/youtube: "Project Bluebeam" Many will be fooled...

    Later ask yourself how we knew in advance.

    Just do NOT accept this:

    http://www.verichipcorp.com/

    Just a co-incidence they are in such a hurry to start it up before 2012?

    Clearer heads are trying to stop it:

    http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2...

  6. supposedly they have a way of containing it. sounds like a bad sci-fi movie coming to life haha

  7. the energy needed to create a black hole is 1.22 x 10^15 TeV. the LHC is capable of producing beams of protons with an energy of 7 TeV. lets see...

    black hole - 1 220 000 000 000 000 TeV

    LHC - 7 TeV

    can you do the math on that one?

    the LHC is not made for creating black holes, as you can see. it is made to create new particles, that we think and hope already exist.

  8. Very unlikely...the media takes buzzwords like black hole out of proportion.  The exact same partical collisions causing black holes in the LHC also happen on the earths surface from particals from space.

    Nothing happens from those.  Just because something is a blackhole doesnt mean it will have enough gravity to suck everything in, gravity is dependent on mass and even with the tightest packed mass there is only so much you can pack in.


  9. We all know that a supernova is a cataclysmic event in which a star explodes, wiping out any planetary system that may have orbited it, but the physical characteristics of the interior of a star that has gone supernova were successfully duplicated at the University of Rochester's Laboratory for Laser Energetics in New York a few years ago.  60 laser beams, powered by 15,000 volts, converged on a single point in the middle of a sphere housed in a two-story target chamber.  60 trillion watts of power assaulted that tiny point for a split second, creating the same pressure and heat that could otherwise only be found in a star.  And yet, mankind survived to tell the tale.  So I think we'll be okay with a micro-singularity that vanishes in milliseconds thanks to zero-point energy and Hawking radiation.

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 9 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.