Laker fans be honest?

Question

if shaq was never on the lakers therefore kobe would of never got 3 rings would yall still consider him the best player in the world with 0 rings??

Answer 1

Same Arguement could be made about shaq he would of been the most dominant player without a ring, because had he NOT been on LA, He would never have been Traded to THe HEAT from ORLANDO.

Answer 2

Shaq can't do it by himself either then cause he didnt go wit Orlando or with Phoenix. we didnt have no one to stop KG(Lamar Odom sucked, i hope they trade him) and that was a big reason we lost but Andrew Bynum's comin back at 100% so we gonna go back.

Answer 3

Without Derek Fisher hitting the 0.4 sec shot Lakers would've lost. Without Robert Horry Lakers would've lost and so on

Answer 4

Lmao NMQ.Don't change the subject.

Answer 5

h**l nah he ain't the best with three rings

Answer 6

Uh huh. I agree with you. Then Shaq wouldn't also be able to do it without Kobe right? ..and Dwyane Wade? Therefore, he wouldn't be even considered one of the greatest centers to play the game? Its like that happening, that instance, they're interdependent. One wouldn't be able to do it without the other. That I'm sure. Shaq would also put up big numbers but he wouldn't be able to win a championship himself because when he was younger, we all know that his salary sucks up the teams payroll -- the team isn't flexible because of his fat contract.

Answer 7

nope kobe would be nuttin if he was on a team like a.i. or lebron james's or the knicks

Answer 8

He's considered the best player in the world because of his skills, not his accomplishments. He can shut a player down defensively, or shoot from anywhere on the court. However, LeBron James is rapidly surpassing him as best player. All he needs to do is work on his defense and his jumper as well.