Look at this trade <span title="again..................-_-?">again..................-_...</span>

Question

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=2997~1717~1024&teams=11~11~18&te=&cash=

Answer 1

not much of a blockbuster but does new york need another point guard?

Answer 2

i like the trade

Answer 3

bad, to me that&#039;s like trading Carl Wheezer for Jimmy Neutron...

Answer 4

The knicks have about 4 or 5 point gaurds on their team they would have to trade 2 point gaurds or a point gaurd with a forward tinsley would not fit with them

Answer 5

the knicks don&#039;t need another huge contract in their payroll, they&#039;ve been trying to waive jerome james, marbury, etc. 2 sign lebron, wade or bosh in the near future....

Answer 6

y trade for him when he could be have for free in about 1 month when the pacers releases him

Answer 7

that&#039;s not a good trade new york dont need a pg they already have marbury.

Answer 8

That would be a good trade if they didn&#039;t have Marbury.

Answer 9

Well marburys out no question, but still not much of a &quot;big trade&quot; although it could give the knicks much needed help at PG. The salarys look pretty compatible althoug I don&#039;t know if the knicks would give up Mardy Collins.