My father and I are looking to go on the adventure of a lifetime, for 2-4 weeks. It'll just be the two of us and we're looking to be camping or at least over-landing. Our interests are the natural world, archaeology and Britain's colonial past.
We've whittled the choice down to the three destinations above. Which should we look into further, in your opinion? I am 22 and have quite a lot of travel experience, my father is 60 and not in bad shape, but his back does goive him a bit of gip. He's too much of an old warhorse to let that stop him though!
Thanks.
Tags: