Lucky LUCKY SYMONDS. cheat?

Question

Again the ugly t**t ( Andrew Symonds) gets help from the umpire. He again gloved a ball to the keeper, and wasnt given out, why is he so lucky.

Do you think symonds should walk, like most dignified and respectful batsmen from all countries, barring some other players from australia.

Answer 1

God dam stop flogging a dead horse, it it the MINORITY, not the majority of players that walk.

Get off your soap box and post somthing with some substance.

First person to be proavtive and walk in the modern era was an Australian, so you need to find somthing better to winge about.

Answer 2

LMAO at Bingalee, she needs to visit a psychatrist ASAP and start getting a treatment of Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD) , poor pigeon Bingalee, she thinks everyone likes australia except Oz, LMAO, Bingalee, you are getting into the deranged zone now , not deserving an explanation !

anyways, answering the main Q, Symonds is a non technical bat with hit and miss type of game , he keeps gloving and standing at the crease and then starts staring the umpires like a STUD, surely has some problems, anyways, LMAo at Australia, Punter started disliking test cricket because grapes are sour now, pitches are dead, LMAO !

226/ 7 , Symonds gloved and got a life and scored a miserable 50.

taylor is back with a bang!

West Indies would have won the series 2-1 , if umpires didn't save australia once again as usual!

Answer 3

I Think most test players walk when they know they have nicked the ball ,..but we know better of him,.. amen~

Answer 4

Not only the lucky one but also the fixer with

umpire Mark Benson for his Pension.Ugly monkey.

Answer 5

Hey My dear friend u know i m watching all Cricket tournament  on a site. last night i watched India v Bangladesh & WI v Aus here. Wow what a site. U know this site always provide batter quality of sound & video. such a great site. i m loving it. U have to try it once. Tomorrow they ll show Kitply Tri Series final match between India v Pakistan. Oh my god i cant wait for this match.

http://www.bhejafry.net/livesports.php

http://www.bhejafry.net/

Answer 6

lol ugly t**t

ye he shud walk

i have seen him gloved so many timess

Answer 7

Yes, he gets decisions in his favour most of the time when australia requires his stand on the ground or in difficult situations. The question players should walk or not , i believe every dignified and respectable player should follow but nowadays more than the spirit of the game or being called dignified, players feel that all around the world other players of same level donot make thier way to pavillion when they know they are out then why should they?

Answer 8

I Think most test players walk when they know they have nicked the ball barring a lot of australian players and few english and south african players.

However experinced batting line ups like india, sri lanka generally most of there batsmen walk.

Its quiet ironic, that gilchrist walked everytime he knew he knicked it, and hes from australia.

However i think all countries dont walk, when they play against australia, because they know that australia wont walk either.

Plus the ugly t**t part was quite funny. Symonds is quite funny or scary looking. I personally really dont like him, and he is so lucky and flukey. I hate watching him bat, no sense of proper cricketing shots.

Answer 9

Personnally I think every bat should walk, but very few do these days  from any country , lets face it, Symonds is not the only one and is fortunate with his decisions.

Answer 10

yet, if it was Tendulkar that nicked one to the keeper (like he did in the ODI series here last summer), nothing would be made mention of it!

No, he shouldnt walk, NO ONE should walk, you have a umpire there to make the deicision, so let him make it!

Dont critize Symonds for accepting the umpires decision, the umpire made his choice, and it must be accepted

Answer 11

I've always been a firm beleiver that not walking is cheating. The umpire's often complain about crowd noise and other such variables that cause them to miss such things, so why should we rely soley on them? We have the technology to make things fair, we should use it.

What got me about the incident, was when he turned to the player (not sure who it was he was talking to), and he said, "I didn't hit it."  That also makes him a liar. Perhaps there's just too much money in it all these days, causing too much temptation. He's certainly not the only player, and Ricky Ponting does his best to discourage walking.

But still... he can play some d**n good cricket! I first seen him playing in the Hong Kong Sixes. Don't think they play that anymore.

Answer 12

Maybe he thinks that it's the responsibility of the umpire to give him out or not out and if the decision is in his favor incorrectly, he is not going to walk out voluntarily. What can we say? It's a moral issue and he has his own standards.