Many argue circumcision reduces sensitivity of glans, so why am i hypersensitive after 40 years circumsision?

Question

Many argue circumcision reduces sensitivity of glans, so why am i hypersensitive after 40 years circumsision?

Answer 1

You have no idea what it would have been like to have been intact so your experience is irrelevant in a debate.

There is no debate. Infant circumcision is never justified.

The only cases that are acceptable are those that involve adults that WANT a circumcision.

Answer 2

Because sexual pleasure isn't just about physical sensation, there are emotional/psychological components as well.  Also, the reduction to the glans probably isn't major in most cases, however, the f******n (which also affects pleasure for your partner) contains many nerves that are also removed.  You also dont know what your hypersensitivity issue would be like if you were intact, worse, better, the same...

As a side note, the f******n also provides lubrication for masturbation and oral/handjobs... which make it easier, cleaner, and more fun.

Answer 3

everyone is different, for you it may be different then most

we argue because of medical evidence

http://www.nocirc.org/touch-test/bju_668...

Answer 4

maybe you don't know what it would be like with?

you can't tell as acomparison is impossible.

Answer 5

Most men in america nowadays are circumsized.  In fact Women prefer that. All those things about sensitivity is just jealous talk from the guys that has that nasty extra skin.

Answer 6

because people that say that circumcision reduces sensitivity are ignorant about what they are talking about.

Answer 7

My partner is 27, circumcised at 2 weeks old; and has never had a problem with loss of sensitivity either.

I understand alot of men on here are and have dealt with frustration and anger over loss of sensitivity due to circumcision, and look into f******n restoration - and also alot of men who would like to get circumcised.

There is no right or wrong answer to the topic of circumcision, for some it's needed (medically), some it's a personal preference, and some it's out of the question.

So before people go giving me thumbs down for answering this question - I'm trying to void my opinion and tell you what I know through my experience.

Which is basically all I mentioned, some men have problems with their circumcision, others have problems with their f******n - and then there's the bunch in the middle who are happy and healthy with what they have.

Some men have a loss of sensitivity, others don't.

Count yourself lucky, but if the hypersensitivity is becomming an issue, maybe consult a doctor.

Answer 8

haha arsn, dude i bet you dont even know what its like to have f******n do you? lol my girl loves it and there's no need for the lube, man you're actually missing out. even if you circumsize you'll still have sensitivity...so what's the point huh?

Answer 9

How would you even know what true hypersensitivity is?

I was mutilated at birth, and the nerve damage destroyed more then the average amount of sensitivity, making it impossible for me to achieve o****m in normal s*x.

Restoring my f******n has given me new sensitivity, and I can compare the two because I've been there---with and without f******n.

There is a big difference between hypersensitivity and premature ejaculation, and the cause of PE isn't always hypersensitivity, it's an inability to control one's body.

Most guys after o****m have a very sensitive glans, whether mutilated or not.

Premature ejaculation can be controlled by learning the body's response to sexual stimulation and learning to slow or stop and prevent early release.

With some men, male genital mutilation doesn't destroy as much sensitivity as others, also.      Circumcision has no standards, it's frequently very sloppily done by medical students, and also 10% of mutilations require additional surgeries to repair damage inflicted by the first one.

A f******n is not a birth defect; it is a birthright.