Hi, I have a question about Marfan's Syndrome...
When I was about 13, I went to a family doctor that noticed I had many, many, many of the characteristics of someone with Marfan's Syndrome (long thin arms and legs, long thin fingers and toes, a high arching upper palette, a small lower mandible, a protruding breastbone, poor hand/feet circulation, a heart murmur, mild scoliosis, etc).
So he sent me for a battery of tests at Children's Hospital. An opthamologist did a slit lens test, and it was perfectly normal. A cardiologist did an EKG and a test even more advanced than that where your heart shows up on a tv next to you, and my aorta, along with the rest of my heart, was deemed perfectly normal. In addition, I'm only 5'11, same heigh as my dad, and my mom and dad are 60 and in good health, and neither have any Marfan's symptoms.
Anyway, Children's Hospital declared that I was fine, that I did not have Marfan's Syndrome, and that I merely had a lot of physical traits of someone who does (called "Marfanoid Habiticus"). They told me there is no need for any follow-ups, because if I had Marfan's Syndrome, by age 13 either a slit-lens test onthe eyes, or the various high-end heart tests they ran, would have detected.
But I read some lady on here claiming she had no aortic or eye involvement until she was 30 or 35?
What I need to know is, did that battery of tests at age 13 truly give me 99% certainty I don't have it, or, were all the doctors wrong, and is that far too early to deem someone out of the woods for testing normal on those tests?
Tags: