Question:

Mats Sundin or Joe Sakic?

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

please mob madison square garden and get the new york rangers to leave the nhl so they do not sign mats sundin and peter forsberg

 Tags:

   Report

15 ANSWERS


  1. Since when have they wanted Forsgber, It says it no where!

    And please don't tell me you have a "source". Because if you do....I'm willing to bet your "source" is a little New Yorker girl that has a crush on Peter.


  2. Right now i would take Sundin. But Sakic is very close after. my reasons for Sundin is that he is a two way player. he can play defence and offence. He also has a great amount of leadership not saying Sakic dosen't! This is just my opinion though!

  3. Both are incredible players and leaders but I would take Sundin, although my answer is biased.

  4. AHHHHHHHH! are  you joking? Joe Sakic, hands down, every time.

  5. I like Sakic but he's really been beat up the last few years with injuries.

  6. what about them? whos better? who's cuter?

  7. i don't understand your question and i don't understand what the big problem is if the rangers get sundin and forsberg

  8. You keep saying that... i keep seeing no evidence the rangers want forsberg.

    Sakic is the better player, but Mats is younger (though not much)... I'd take sundin right now, I think.

  9. Washed up vs has been?

    Just kidding.   At this point, I'd take Sundin, in a heartbeat.  

    Sakic looked anemic during the playoffs.....it was kind of sad.   He'd be very lucky to crack the second line on any NHL team.

    Sundin has a a year or two left and could be very effective on the right team.

    PS.....one of the big reasons Sundin is the easy choice here is because of DEFENSIVE play.   Sakic doesn't do it.  Sundin does.   In their prime, with the current NHL rules (theoretically), Sakic would be incredible, but Sundin is just clearly, CLEARLY....the better commodity right now.

  10. Sundin.  If he could motivate a team as hopeless as the Leafs were into one final push at the end of the season there he can motivate anyone.

  11. joe joe sakic.

    who cares if the rangers get either like i said when it comes to the rangers...

    no defense BOOM NO CHAMPIONSHIP

  12. Sakic.  Sundin isn't a bad player, but I'd take Sakic in a heartbeat.

    Glad Sundin stuck around for the last six weeks of the season and did such a crackerjack job...never mind.

  13. I'd say Sundin...and I understand your point that the Rangers get all the oldies on there way back over the hill. Such as Wayne,Mess, Jags,Graves,Shanny, and many many more.

  14. Joe Sakic is my second favorite player to ever wear #19 and is easily in my top 10 best players I have personally seen play the game.

    I am getting kind of tired of the Sundin hype.  Also where are you finding the Rangers are interested in Forsberg?  Why would they want a guy who sat out half the year last year, then signed with the Avs, then essentially sat out the rest of the year with more injuries?

  15. Sakic is the better player.

    Even right now with Sundin being a couple of yrs younger I still take Sakic.  More of a leader than Sundin. generally better point producer.

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 15 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.
Unanswered Questions