Mcdonalds???

Question

lets say u have an hour for lunch and u do at mcdonalds, would u rather have a FRESH meal or wouldnt it matter cuz u only have 1 hour for lunch???

id rather have a fresh meal xD

Answer 1

well if u only have and hour for lunch maybe you could go to subway, they are fast and healthy. if u had less time then maybe mcdonalds. try to shoot for healthy not speed. speed doent always equal best quality

Answer 2

even as a kid i didn't like McDonald's.I don't think they use quality products.McDonald's is the only place that sell french fries that will last forever.Ever sit in your car to eat McDonald's, drop a few fries under the seat, let it stay for a month or so and notice the fries still look the same just a little limp or really hard

Answer 3

If I had a hour for lunch I will like the fresh meal. If I only had a couple of mins and I had to grab something quick it would be burger king Mcdonalds would be my last choice and I had to grab anything quick.

Answer 4

fresh meal!

Answer 5

I'd eat McDonald's.

Answer 6

the prices are probably going to be the same for an entire meal.but i'd pay a little more for something better.plan it out,and call it in a head off time.

Answer 7

i never eat mcdonalds.  i'd starve first.

Answer 8

I would rather eat a cat recently hit by a car.

Answer 9

I'd rather walk across the plaza and go to Subway. I work at McDonald's, and I get 1/2 off, but I'd rather eat something healthier.

Answer 10

id have mcdonalds

Answer 11

Freash meal

Answer 12

Fresh meal! =)

Answer 13

I think a fresh meal is better that any other fast food. You should consider Subway...