Men, what is your view on circumcision?

Question

Men, what is your view on circumcision?

Answer 1

Should have a choice really..

It is there for a reason, only if something goes wrong should it be removed.. It shouldn't be done for the sake of it..

Answer 2

That its a completely unnecessary procedure that only be performed on males old enough to consent to it.

There is no need to put a baby boy through a painful and irreversible surgery on the basis that one day he MIGHT develop a problem.

I'm so glad my parents didn't circumcise me. My f******n has only ever brought me pleasure and entertainment, and never a single problem.

Answer 3

I am circumcised, had a condition call phimosis, so had to get it snipped at the age of 16. It is a lot cleaner, but takes a while to get used to.

Answer 4

I think being uncircumcised is better. I'm not circumcised but I heard that being uncircumcised is more comfortable and you enjoy s*x more.

Answer 5

I personally beleive that you shouldn't tamper with your body. You wasn't born like it so why get it done? Religios reasons? If your god wanted you to have no f******n surely he/she would of created you with no f******n. Women don't seem to mind if you are circumcised so thats not a problem. It's completly opinions sake I think.

Answer 6

I think that it is a horrible mutilation. There's a youtube video on infant circumcision and it is the absolutely most horrific thing that I have ever seen.

Answer 7

Circumcision for most guys is totally unnecessary.  Exceptions are 1) if you do it for religious reasons; or 2) you have a tight f******n that causes pain (does occur but rarely).

Cutting away the f******n will eliminate some of the sensual feelings in your p***s when you have s*x.  Also having a f******n will assist in longer staying power inside a woman's v****a.  The f******n will protect the head as you glide back and forth -- but when you are ready to finish, then you can pump strongly and expose more the head inside her, which will result in both of you having more pleasure.

However, if you keep your f******n, you do have to spend some time every day on keeping it clean inside.  When you shower, you need to take care to pull back the f******n and gently wash the head (to get rid of any accumulated cheesy-looking stuff) either with a very gentle soap (think baby soap) or with a good wash in warm water.  However, this should be done by boys only after they reach puberty -- NOT with babies.  Fathers do have to take responsibility to explain to their sons at puberty what needs to be done.  (Yes, I know, some fathers don't want to talk to their sons about intimate details of hygiene.  But they should.)

I can think of no reason why a parent would circumcise a baby boy (other than for religious reasons).  This decision should be left for the male once he reaches maturity, since the operation really cannot be reversed with any great success.

The medical community often encourages this operation (which is just an elective and largely cosmetic procedure).  Save your money and leave the decision to your son when he grows up.

Answer 8

i prefer uncircumsized it is more natural

Answer 9

i dont have a view  

Answer 10

Like most men, i view it looking downward, mostly.

Answer 11

I think if you want to get it done on yourself, go ahead... but it shouldn't be something done on infants.  Everyone deserves the right to choose what is best for their body, their life.

Klyp, there are plenty of men that are perfectly happy with their foreskins, some like you would rather be circed, no problem get it done, but your son still deserves a preference and choice of his own.  Sexual pleasure also isn't all about touch, it is psychological as well.  So despite the fact you were cut as an adult and your glans is still "fresh" providing more sensation then someone your own age circed as an infant, much of the increase for you could be psychological.

Answer 12

I am neither for or against circumcision, as such.

I am however against people having it done to their children with out the benefit of knowing whether that child wants it done or not!

With the exception of medical reasons, each male should be able to decide for himself if he wishes to be circumcised or not.

There is nothing wrong with being a guy who is cut or being a guy who is uncut, but it should be the choice of the person who is attached to the p***s in question!

Answer 13

Well I'm not circumcised and very happy about that. I think it's fine as long as it's a personal choice. And personal choice doesn't mean your parents decided for you when you were born. Boys should not be circumcised at birth because they didn't make that decision.  

Answer 14

Personally I had no choice..I was circumcised at birth...but there is mounting evidence that circumcision may reduce the incidence of HIV and other STIs...

Answer 15

My view since I had it done at age 26 is that I am definitely "cut". There is not question about it. There is old "baldie" looking up at me. No one forced me to get it "done" . I wanted this very much and have no reason to regret my choice. I had learned the benefits(and there are many) of male circumcision as a medical student. The sight of old men with their foreskins scarred, tight and maybe caught behind the glans rim made me have no desire to have this minor procedure when I was a sick old guy.

It has made my s*x life better, the orgasms became more intense and easier to control and I also feel more attractive when I am minus my clothes.There are good pro-circumcision sites that can fill you in on the benefits instead of horror stories

Answer 16

circumcized at birth.  I wish parents would have waited and let me make that choice.  

Answer 17

Male genital mutilation, and just as wrong as female circumcision.

Does not prevent HIV or any other diseases.    Look at Europe, Asia and South America--their HIV rates are low, and their men are intact.

It certainly didn't prevent any HIV in lthe USA, where most males have been mutilated for years.    

Damages the p***s, destroys penile sensitivity, damages sexual ability.     Decreases  p***s size.

Nothing good comes from mutilating genitals, except to the doctors who make money from it and are biased, as many of them belong to the minority religions that try to impose this practice on others; that's how it became so widespread in the first place in the USA>

In the rest of the world, 80% of the men are intact, and they evidently enjoy it as evidenced by the birthrates in those places.

A f******n is not a birth defect; it is a birthright.