Question: Is moving people en-mass to the UK from distant countries a reckless and undemocratic experiment ?
Question Details: People are moving en mass to the UK regardless of the opinion of the real British. Certain countries have proven significant differences with real British people as shown in the Corruption map below. This makes mass immigration from some countries a reckless experiment and would not be accepted if the real British were asked about it first. To rephrase the question: Do you agree that if the British had been asked would we have mass 3rd world immigration into the UK? THE BEST AND THE WORST 5 least corrupt states: Iceland Finland New Zealand Denmark Singapore 5 most corrupt states: Chad Bangladesh Turkmenistan Burma Haiti Source: Transparency International http://www.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/cpi/2007 Criticism of the Government's immigration policy intensified when Julie Spence, the Chief Constable of Cambridgeshire, revealed how the steady flow of Eastern European migrants with "different standards" was placing a huge strain on her rural police force. Other police chiefs backed Mrs Spence's comments. sothatswotdidit,Bored in job?, bored in Yahoo Answers about the most significant change in the whole of UK history namely a creeping immigration takeover, get an Open University course. Eugenics possibly?
Deleted Answer: boring mike!!!stop peddling cr@p - next please
Violation Reason:Insulting Other Participants
If you feel this content was removed in error, please contact Customer Care and tell us why.
Regards,
Yahoo! Customer Care
Tags: