Miley cyrus?

Question

alot of people say miley cyrus posed nude but she didnt all she did was show her back do you think that is bad?

Answer 1

either way she was naked - she covered up but still. the chicks only 15 she's so insane- like what the h**l is she thinking! she's way too young

Answer 2

its only her back- its not like a whole vanessa scandal again, so its not bad. and sure shes an idol to loads of little girls but they already go around wearing swimsuits and things which show just as much skin so it really isnt bad at all/

Answer 3

it wasn't just 4 a magazine she was also on page 3 of the sun wearing only a pair of thongs but it wasn't her decision it was her managers choice she only did 4 the money x

Answer 4

i agree.

while she is a young-girl role model, it wasn't showing more than it would if she was wearing a swim suit!

also, annie leibovitz is artistic and people should realize that's her style of photography.

i thought the picture was very artistic and miley shouldn't have had to apologize.

Answer 5

No way josé!   Miley Cirus is the best!  lol

Answer 6

Woah - no way!

People misunderstood - the image might've been bad in your head, but not on the actual photo. People's imaginations should have stopped at the picture, not go further on.

She might've been wearing a bikini - one with no back except for the tie around your head - and her hair might cover it. That's my idea, anyway.

Whatever you do please don't think Miley Cyrus is bad - she is not and you probably know that.

Hope you understand my point.

Answer 7

I don't think it was bad I saw a pic of her standing up that day and she had jeans on and the sheet thing was a shirt that looked like one it didn't go to the ground all it was was a weird fake sheet shirt thing

Answer 8

No, the picture itself wasn't bad, but the 'idea' was. Miley Cyrus, idol to hundreds of thouands of young girls, posing part-naked on a magazine cover. Thats what is pissing people off.