Misandrists, anti-fems and their ilk....?

Question

When can we expect to see a protest, a march, a peaceful sit-in... something. All I'm seeing is people complaining that I'm ruining lives, families, and the social structure. People like me are probably also the cause for monsoons, sandstorms and mosquitos.

So when can I tune in to CNN and see you guys marching on DC?

What will your signs say?

Answer 1

Sit-ins, protests and peaceful marches won't work.

I think falsifying statistics is best way to promote change...after all, it worked for the feminist movement.

Besides, most of us are too busy working to EARN the jobs and money we have.

Answer 2

Probably about the same time we see feminists protesting, marching or having a peaceful sit in for something other than trying to clean up their man hating, obese, lack of hygiene image.

Answer 3

You are also the cause for warm beer, and that is a true crime!

I live in Melbourne, DC is too far away for me!

Protest marches are useless, as are sit-ins.  A major p**s-up is a better idea, just so long as we drink good beer.

Answer 4

I am a feminist/humanist Where are you from? we have Medicare, equal pay, the dole (for people that need it.) We have media that isn't corrupted by money. People that aren't swayed by polls.

Can I guess do you live in America?

Where health care is primarily for the rich, freedom of speech is for the majority and equal rights is a laughable assumption. America is not the most progressive country in their thinking. The mentality of Americans; I have to make money, to pay for my surgery which will get me the right partner and make me more money. I Don’t respect America they all seem totalianrian and greedy; at least the mainstream America. I hope Hollywood falls to ****.

CNN FOX news blah blah blah, I wish you could watch a real news station. American media will be the downfall of the American people.  

Answer 5

^ Actually I think men acceding to women, women's greed and women not accepting their own limitations could possibly slow America down.

But I bet I'd still rather live here than wherever the h**l you're from Rage.  

Answer 6

No it is not you personally that's doing those things, it is your movement.

Ooh Shivers, the claws are out, I like it.

It's difficult to do.

In 1971, Pizzey opened the first battered wives shelter in England, which she ran until 1982. Arguably, the Chiswick Family Rescue was the second domestic violence shelter in the world. Pizzey's book "Scream Quietly or the Neighbours Will Hear" (1974, out of print) was one of the first to explore and expose wife battering.

Today, the shelter Pizzey founded denies her entry; her name does not appear in its official history.

Pizzey's 'mistake' was to diverge from the theory of domestic violence that feminists at the time insisted dominate all discussion. She believed that men could also be the victims of domestic violence, and that women could be as violent toward their partners as men.

Pizzey's views put her on a collision course with PC feminists who, according to Pizzey's own published account of events, initiated a campaign of harassment and violence against her.

Pizzey described this harassment in an article she published in the Scotsman in 1999.

"Because of my opposition to the hijacking of the refuge movement, I was a target for abuse. Anywhere I spoke there was a contingent of screaming, heckling feminists waiting for me," Pizzey wrote. "Abusive telephone calls to my home, death threats and bomb scares, became a way of living for me and for my family. Finally, the bomb squad, asked me to have all my mail delivered to their head quarters."

One night, the family dog was killed.

Eventually, "exhausted and disillusioned," Pizzey said she went into "exile with her children and grandchildren," leaving England in 1982 to live in Santa Fe, New Mexico.

Pizzey returned to England that same year for the book tour of her next book, "Prone to Violence," which once again ignited a violent reaction among feminists. Pizzey wrote that when she arrived in England for her book tour, she was "met with a solid wall of feminist demonstrators" carrying signs that read "ALL MEN ARE RAPISTS, ALL MEN ARE BATTERERS."

"The police insisted that I have an escort all round England for my book tour," Pizzey wrote in the Scotsman.

There is some reason to believe that "Prone to Violence" has been the target of a campaign of suppression by PC feminists. According to the web site Wikepedia, in 1996 an internet search of the world libraries that can be accessed through the Library of Congress uncovered only 13 listings for the book: an astonishingly low number for a pioneering work that caused a sensation.

Why would PC feminists nearly riot over a book and, then, ignore it?

Because Pizzey advanced a competing theory of domestic violence.

When viewed through the PC lens of class oppression, domestic violence is not an act of violence committed by one individual against another. It is an act committed by men that must be correctly understood within the larger context of women's class oppression.

"Prone to Violence" spelled out some of Pizzey's disagreements with that view.

Disagreement #1: Of the first 100 women who entered Chiswick, Pizzey found that over 60 percent were as violent or more violent than the men they were fleeing. In short, a significant percentage of the women were also batterers or otherwise active participants in the violence.

Disagreement #2: Pizzey developed the theory that many battered women were psychologically drawn to abusive relationships and they sought them out. To PC feminists, such analysis was tantamount to 'blaming the victim.'

Disagreement #3: She explained why the existing model of domestic violence shelters was ineffective. PC feminists were attempting then (and now) to secure ever greater financing for these operations. Sandra Horley, director of Chiswick in 1992, reportedly complained, "if we put across this idea that the abuse of men is as great as the abuse of women, then it could seriously affect our funding."

Pizzey may or may not have been correct; I believe she was and is.

Neverthless, her book drew upon over 10 years at the Chiswick shelter during which time Pizzey dealt with some 5,000 women and children.

"Prone to Violence" is an extremely early and honest overview of domestic violence from a woman with extensive experience of its daily realities. The book cried out to be taken seriously. At minimum, it deserved a thorough rebuttal from its PC feminist critics--not death threats directed at its author nor the ultimate silence it received.

Pizzey is not alone. In America, Suzanne Steinmetz -- author of the book "The Battered Husband" and a co-author of the much-cited "First National Family Violence Survey" -- experienced a similar drama. She and her children received death threats; an ACLU meeting at which she spoke received a bomb threat.

The reason: her research indicated that the rate at which men were victimized by domestic violence was similar to the rate for women.

In large and small ways -- from shrill protests to the tearing down of announcements, from blocking university promotions to threats and defamation -- PC feminism has attempted to stop voices it could not control.

Feminism is dying not from a backlash but from an orthodoxy that cannot tolerate real discussion...and never could.

Neil Lyndon's life was also destroyed because he spoke out

http://www.ukmm.org.uk/issues/suppressio...

Scoff all you want, this ideology is going the same way as Catholisim.

There are too many black marks against feminism.

Answer 7

Don't forget that you are also to blame that [insert name of favorite sports team] is doing so badly.

My sign would be huge

"Inculcate the reprobates"

That'll send folks to the dictionary

Answer 8

A protest march of fathers who aren't allowed see their children and honest men who have suffered DV, won't be listened to or heeded, by either the majority of women or men. It will currently be seen as a joke, so what would be the point?

I'm not a conservative crank, so I don't believe feminism is responsible for poverty, decline of social morals, and all that semi-religious claptrap, but I do believe that radical feminism has had a pernicious effect on the law pertaining to DV and custody/access rights.

It is going to take years before the public accepts that the law surrounding these issues was never balanced to help women, as it should have been, but rather blindly put in a woman's favour. It harms everyone in the end.

Answer 9

Fathers are holding regular protests on Harriet Harman, they're climbing on her roof.

Google it.

Try reading Glenn Sacks blog, he even has a spot in his blog called the feminist dissident, where you can argue with the regulars.

I still dont know what your fighting for. Instead of moaning and whining here in North America, why dont you turn all that pro-woman energy where its really needed, in the Middle East and parts of Europe.

Answer 10

Don't think they could organise a shag in a brothel let alone a protest, to be honest.