Mr T says he is not Homophobic

Question

Why would he be homophobic? just because an advert he does about a chocolate bar that has peanuts in it that offends some extremest g*y rights people.

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/wenn/20080810/ten-mr-t-advert-is-not-homophobic-c60bd6d.html

Its about time we stopped pandering to these idiots who complain about anything from Mayo to chocolate bars.

These are the same people bearing in mind who think its ok for g*y people to openly have oral s*x in front of children during the g*y carnival in San Fransisco.

Your thoughts please

Answer 1

theres no shutting them up best to ostracise and ignore them

Answer 2

What a bunch of girlie men.....always whining like little girls...getting their panties in a bind.

Answer 3

What this says to me is extremest g*y rights people don't have a sense of humour.(That's if it's true)

Answer 4

It is getting ridiculous, we have to watch what we're saying now because it upsets people....

To me it's all B.S.

Answer 5

He's an old 'has-been' does anyone really care?!?

Answer 6

With you all the way! Gone too far with all this PC c**p, there has to be a sensible limit.

Answer 7

Oh dear - not again. Sometimes it's hard to be even a well-behaved g*y man after reading such clips! But remember the yelling and screaming from people the same shade as Mr. T years ago about what seemed to be the same innocuous ads - Robertson's jam for one. As for Mayo - who on earth would want to 'diss' anything (or anyone) from a certain part of Ireland?

Answer 8

Can I just say, don't blame this on homosexuals in general, I'm g*y and was NOT offended in the slightest. Reason being the advert didn't even include any homosexuals !!

I can't understand why this homosexual group decided weak men automatically pertain to them, but it's insane. I didn't even imagine any homosexuality or homophobia in the advert because it didn't exist.

Answer 9

You have the wrong end of the stick my secret agent friend.

Mr T was never called homophobic, it was the advert that was called it.

It showed a geeky looking man power walking with Mr T in a Abrams tank berating him for wussy looking walking, that is all. It was not pulled as someone objected, it was pulled as the advertiser thought it "might" be offensive. It is no good making decisions of what you think people might think, they don't know what people think. I think the advertisers are big girls blouses of the first rank, they make me want to spit.

Answer 10

I cannot believe a nation ( the US ) that was outraged over a

" wardrobe malfunction "during a football game,

( although I understand the massive fine given to the channel who showed it has since been overturned )

would seriously allow g*y people to commit a crime by openly having oral s*x during the carnival, in front of children without attracting a backlash!

will these people (parents ) make up their minds please?

it's either illegal or it's not!