NOT SEXIST AT ALL. Would Hillary be able to calm tensions in the middle east?

Question

Being a woman and all, do you think that Hillary would be able to ease tension with Middle Eastern countries who have little respect for women?

Answer 1

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!...

Culturally speaking middle eastern countries just aren't so keen on women and that is the fact we can't dispute. Condoleeze Rice who is fluent in Arabic gets trashed regularly by islamic papers. Although they have a point about the spinster comment.

You can not through power, through culture or through force make them change their views.

Answer 2

No she will make the situation worse, she recently said she would wipe out Iran.

Answer 3

It depends on what time of the month it is. Iran might pick a bad day to p**s her off.

Wait, is that sexist? My bad. Sorry.

Answer 4

No.. She already said she was ready to bomb Iran, sounds like McCain now..... Who will she be next week?

Answer 5

It has nothing to do with her being a woman.  She is an annoying whiner and know-it-all.  She is a real turn-off, man.

Answer 6

The Middle East has a very, very long way to go to be able to catch up to the western world's view of women, but the degradation of women in the Middle East is sometimes blown out of proportion. There are some instances in history where those countries allowed women freedoms that western countries took years to allow. To get to the point, Hillary Clinton would definitely be able to handle herself. She respects their views, and she will know how to adapt to the situation.

Answer 7

No, I don't think so, not until religion is taken off the table and replaced by law. and by the way you are sexist, being a man and all.

Answer 8

I think so, as long as she felt confident in her policy there.

Er, I have to admit, sorry about this, but my take on a lot of the people involved in the violence in the middle east is that they do not see women as their equals. Therefore, I change my mind, I think she would not be able to get anywhere, or, about as far as Carter has got in his entire life, whichever is greater.

Answer 9

h**l No! In fact, she's going to make it worse.

Haven't you heard ? She's Threaten to Blow Up Iran, right out of the Map. If Iran attacks Israel with nuclear Weapons.  

In my Opinion I can almost guarantee you that, if Hillary Clinton is elected President. Her first order of business will be to Trigger World War 3.

& I'm not joking or making this stuff up. Here's what she's said herself : "I want the Iranians to know that if I'm the president, we will attack Iran," Clinton said.

"In the next 10 years, during which they might foolishly consider launching an attack on Israel, we would be able to totally obliterate them."

& then she said: "You need to be ready for anything -- especially now, with two wars, oil prices skyrocketing and an economy in crisis.''

I mean can't you see that this woman is trying to Trigger World War 3 ??

In my opinion she's a Horrible Option for president. Don't Vote for Hillary Clinton.

I mean why would you vote for a president that has threaten to Blow Up Iran, which could cause World War 3. A war where they'll be No Winners. A War which will very likely cause Billions of Deaths Worldwide. & Millions of Deaths in the U.S alone.

I mean why cause such a bloody massacre, which could be easily be aborted by not voting for Hillary Clinton. & by Pressuring the other Electives for President, that We want an END to the 2 Wars that the U.S is fighting right now.

Because if the U.S stopped those 2 Wars that is fighting right now, that could be the very thing that could calm down tensions in the Middle East.

Answer 10

I think in most places of the world she would be able to ease tensions, BUT! Because this is the middle east, there are a lot of people who do not value women there, and I do not believe they will be willing to listen to her.