0 LIKES LikeUnLike
OK so I just found out this public place is built on top of a burial mound... there are still bones in it and the bones they already dug up were reburied in another location in a mass gave type deal.... is this right? it has been kind of bothering me since I found out about it.... but does this happen alot at old burial sites? shouldn't they have moved all the bones/artifacts first? or is the fact they left it alone ( and built on top of it) better? OR should they have not been allowed to build on the site at all? thoughts? opinions? thanks!
Tags:
Report (0) (0) | earlier
Latest activity: earlier. This question has 5 answers.