I have worked for my employer for 4 1/2 years, and 2 1/2 years ago I transferred from a small city office to their head office on the outskirts of the city, as a result of the small office closing down. The year after I transferred I was told I was not entitled to a pay rise because I earnt more than my colleagues (we're talking a few hundred pounds, not thousands) as I came from a city office, and therefore earnt more. This year I was given 1% pay rise, whereas everyone else received between 2 - 4%. I have ben told that if they give me any pay rises then I will continue to earn more, which is not fair on them. My argument is that firstly I was not told about this before I transferred, and secondly that my pay rise (or lack of) is being judged solely on my colleagues salaries rather than my work performance (always excellent reviews). While I understand where they are coming from, how does a company expect anyone to be happy with this excuse long-term? Is this really fair? I am starting to feel under-valued and demotivated, and feel I cannot sustain working for a company that is going to use this excuse every year.
Tags: