Non-smokers, would you smoke if there were no health implications whatsoever?

Question

Why or why not? Thanks.

Answer 1

I smoked for two weeks when I was 17 years old.  At the time, I was visiting NYC and had this notion I was being "sophisticated."  However, it didn't take long to figure out that there's nothing "sophisticated" about having smelly hair or stained hands and teeth, and unpleasant breath....which is what a number of smokers have if they smoke long term.  It's one of the fastest ways to age a person. So even if all the health implications magically disappeared, the answer would still be no.

Answer 2

OMG!!! How can a non smoker relate to this question. For how can you crave something that you've never had? I don't get it

Answer 3

no, its just a waste of money to me. id rather buy a new purse or something

Answer 4

yeah probably!

I personally don't think it's a disgusting habit - infact (this may sound weird) i like the smell of smoke! Well, maybe not in my house...

But the only thing thats stopping me from smoking is because i have a family history of heart disease and i don't want to push it over the edge.

Answer 5

I dunno maybe. It is still harmful though so why bother with the what if's?

Answer 6

No. If their are no addicting qualities to it, then why do it? To look cool? I don't think that way. People that smoke to me just look like people that smoke. No cooler or uncooler than anyone else.