Disclaimer: I am NOT a racist nor am I against illegal immigration (I myself am a first-generation immigrant).
As noted in the disclaimer, I am not a racist but a law student studying the Constitution. Having said that, my question is: why was California's Proposition 187 illegal? (see wikipedia at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Proposition_187_(1994)).
The undocumented workers entered the country illegally. Proposition 187 simply attempts to punish these "criminals" by stripping them of certain privileges. Why, then, did the courts decide such punishments to be unconstitutional? Isn't it natural, just, and constitutionally-sound to punish when someone does something wrong??
Submitted by a confused 1st-year law student.
Tags: