One way to stop those burmese generals from sleeping is to allow thailand and bangaldesh to liberate burma?l?

Question

I STILL REMEMBER PRIME MINISTER EHUD OLMERT TELLING LEBANON THAT IF ISRAELIS CANNOT SLEEP THEN LEBANESE PEOPLE ALSO CANNOT SLEEP.

HEZBOLLAH REPLIED....IT WAS A MISTAKE TO KIDNAPPED THOSE TWO ISRAELIS SOLDIERS.

MAYBE, THOSE IRANIAN TOLD THEM TO DO IT OR NO MONEY FROM IRAN?

FOR TWO SOLDIERS, LEBANON LOST ABOUT 12,000,000,000 IN PROPERTY DAMAGE?

LORD JESUS CHRIST THE SON OF THE LIVING GOD ONCE SAID THAT IF YOU KNOW THE COST OF WAR THEN MAKE PEACE WITH THE ENEMY.

USING THIS THEORY, ALL NATIONS WILL SIGN NON-AGGRESSION PACT WITH THEIR NEIGHBOURS AND SAVE SOME BUDGET MONEY ON MILITARY.

KING SOLOMON WAS WISER AND HE MARRIE 1,000 WIVES FROM 1,000 NATIONS.

LOOK LIKE ALL LEADERS IN THIS WORLD WILL HAVE ABOUT 200 WIVE FROM NEXT YEAR?

IN SIMPLE ENGLISH THEY WILL HAVE 200 WIVE IN 200 NATIONS.

WELL THEY WILL COMPLETE THE CYCLE IN 4 YEARS AT THE RATE ONE WEEK PER NATION.

WHY SHOULD CIVILIAN DIE WHEN LEADER MAKE

MISTAKES?

Answer 1

Under current international law, a nation may do anything it pleases within its own borders, it is only when it attacks people outside of its own borders that other nations are justified in invading.

Israel is being attacked on a regular basis, and is fighting back.  Under international law, Israel is justified in making attacks on the places they believe to be the sources of attacks on them.

Various nations are being attacked by terrorists, who hail from virtually every nation on Earth.  For the most part, when terrorists attack nation A______A (fill in name of nation-A) that may have come from nation B_____B (fill in name of nation-B), which in some cases is the SAME nation, it is not legitimate for nation-A to counter-attack against nation-B unless they have pretty good proof that the terrorists really do represent the leadership of nation-B.

Under international law, since Burma has attacked NO ONE outside their borders, no other nation on the planet has any right to go in there and stop them doing what is their right under international law to do to their own people.

There's lots of precedents for this.

The only way to solve this, without breaking international law, is for the United Nations to agree to authorize force to go in there, like was done in Korea, Bosnia, Iraq, and other places.

Authorizing an invasion is one thing, what nations will supply the troops is another.

Why would Thailand and Bangladesh want to do this?

From your question, I assume you are a Christian, because other religions think Jesus Christ was an ordinary mortal human being.  

Do you understand that the Buddhist Monks are of a different religion?  They don't even believe in the Christian God.

Answer 2

Aside from your confusing religious ramblings, whatever makes you think that Thailand or Bangladesh would or could liberate Burma?  Both of those countries have more problems themselves than they can possibly handle without getting involved in a war with Burma, which they would probably lose anyway, neither one being a military power.

Answer 3

one Thailand and Banglaldesh can't even take care of themselves - read the news.

secondly, what in the name of all things holy are you rambling on about? You want to be in a polygamy relationship? What is your actual concern? the military juntas in control of the country?  Are you criticizing Lebanon?

Thirdly, please stop making a statement and putting a question mark behind it.

Answer 4

it is not a wise advice to attack another soverign state,burmeese people should find a way out,not like americans liberating iraq and freeing people

Answer 5

Aside from your rambling digression, if the traditional 'enemies' of Burma invade, then the generals will only intensify their repression of those they see as collaborators and traitors.

The sincerity of Thailand would be rightly brought into question and may well force the population to unite behind the generals, thus strengthening their grip for decades to come.

We have to give the Burmese people the means to do it for themselves.

Answer 6

lol...I don't think Thailand will liberate Burma. Even they hate Burma, they continue feeding the Burmese generals with money so they can keep the power and keep the borders more closed.

The worst thing which can happens - from a Thailand view - is that the Burmese borders opens, because then Thailand will loose their big tourist income.