Other than Denver, which RBBC wastes your roster spots?

Question

"Jephatitis E" touched on an interesting scenario that I hadn't seen mentioned here before. Some team's RBBC forces managers to fill their roster with backups, handcuffs and 'maybes' -- spots that more often than not are wasted.

So, other than Denver, which RBBC will waste your roster space?

--------------

Jephatits E's comment that led to this question:

Selvin Young - if you know who he plays for, you know why. once you take a Denver RB, you're a part of the soap opera all year. i'll let someone else lose sleep and waste roster spots.

Answer 1

Well, with all due respect, RBBC is in complete fashion in the NFL.  It's a fantasy reality, one we must all cope with.  Denver is one of MANY.

Each of the teams I'll list diminish the starting back's role.  True feature backs are few and far between, hence their value.

I don't disagree that Denver can be a huge fantasy risk, but it's the nature of the NFL.

Can you name but a few teams without RBBC?  Here's 17, in just a few minute's worth of work:

Minnesota: Peterson, Taylor

Jacksonville: Taylor, MJD

Tampa: Graham, Dunn, possibly Williams

Oakland: McFadden, Fargas, Bush, Jordan

Detroit: Bell, Smith, Cason

Pittsburgh: Parker, Mendenhall

Dallas: Barber, F. Jones (formerly J. Jones)

Atlanta: Norwood, Turner

New Orleans: Bush, McAllister

NY Giants: Jacobs, Ward, Bradshaw

Washington: Portis, Betts

Miami: Brown*, Williams

Houston: Green, Slaton, Brown

Tennessee: White, Johnson, Henry

Carolina: Williams, Stewart

Bears: Peterson, Wolfe, Forte

Seattle: Duckett, Jones, Morris

*Injury related

THIS is exactly why LT, Westbrook, Addai, and Jackson are extremely valuable.  FEATURE backs matter, and are a dying breed.

Yes, Denver has Shanahan the Devil, but that's hardly rare.

And yes, as a Denver fan I am sensitive.  Somebody hold me.