Other than their skin colour - Are there Real differences between Mugabe and Bush?

Question

Other than their skin colour - Are there Real differences between Mugabe and Bush?

Answer 1

In the last US election Bush did not accept a loss. There is a lot of evidence that the election was fixed.

Answer 2

Mugabe is a dictator and everybody knows it. Bush is a dictator and has convinced everyone he leads a democracy.

"Bush would at least accept an unfavourable election result."

As I recall it he didn't accept a possibly unfavourable election result.  He had the Supreme court appoint him president when the ballots were not all counted - first time in the history of the U.S.A. and hopefully the last.

Answer 3

Bush has access to intercontinental ballistic thermo-nuclear warheads and I am glad it is that way around and not the other!!!! Mugabe would have nuked Britain by now....

________

"-Bush does not have henchmen who beat, rape, torture, and kill dissidents at his whim."

Guantanamo Bay, Iraq, Afghanistan. American sailors raping Japanese schoolgirls....hmm....

Answer 4

Yes

Bush is not cling to power he just makes "bad" decisions.

I said "bad" because its bad foreveryone but for him its brilliant because he will be rich from all the oil money.

Answer 5

i dont think so they both have s*x with donkeys!

Answer 6

-Bush has ruled for 2 terms of 4 years each, whereas Mugabe has ruled almost thirty.

-Bush was elected twice, albeit beating Al Gore only by virtue of the electoral college the first time and winning by a narrow margin against John Kerry in the second election.

-Bush does not have henchmen who beat, rape, torture, and kill dissidents at his whim.

-Bush has not (yet) taken an official concubine despite Laura's getting on in years, while Mugabe was quite publicly ******* a much younger Grace while Sally was dying.

-Bush has mismanaged the economy but has not raised the inflation rate to six-skillion percent.

Bush may be a bad president but he is certainly not a dictator in the Mugabean sense.

Answer 7

Come on, give Dubya a chance - he may not be the sharpest tool in the shed, and he may have done some unjustifiable things, but to compare him to that despot is a bit much. Bush would at least accept an unfavourable election result. Credit where credit's due! (And don't get me wrong, I'm no fan, I just think there are worse than him!)

Answer 8

They are both g*y - does that clear things up a bit?

lol

Answer 9

Mugabe took over the machinery of colonialism, instead of destroying the institutions. That was the basis of his turning corrupt.

Answer 10

Oh my, really? I dislike Bush a great deal, but I would rather be stuck with him than that senile baboon Zimbabwe has for a president!!

Answer 11

Bush is marginally more intelligent, but they're both monkeys.

Answer 12

I hope you're joking. Do you have any conception of the evil incarnate in Mugabe?