When we put her in last year there was no slot for her in the 2's class, so she was placed in the 1's. The nearest child in age to her is 4 months younger and there are at least 2 children 11 months younger than her. We feel she should be with the 3 year olds {we want her to be around children her age}. The director says she "needs to be a leader" and she does not have the attention span to be in the 3's yet she sits through movies like Ratatouille, fully engaged. I think she is board with her class, and even her teacher says she should not be with the 2's, but with the 3's.
We will start her in K when she turns 5 {the law here is must be 5 on Sep 1} Are we being "anal" about her being with 3 year olds over 2 year olds? Are we shortchanging her development by keeping her with children that are a year less developed and mature than her? Please offer thought out responses. Thanks!
Tags: