POLL:HERITAGE VS INFRASTRUCTURE,what is your opinion?

Question

Retrieved from The Star: http://poll.thestar.com.my/forms/form.asp?file=/2008/8/90

Is this poll reflecting our current BN government does not know how to manage the budgets properly?

This poll has no suitable options for me.I think there should be a balance in preserving both heritage buildings and developing infrastructures.I think the one who sets this poll is already fed up with the misappropriate allocations done by BN government in spending money in 'heritage' and 'infrastructure'.

Are you satisfied with the ways of BN government and the local municipals in spending money?

Should KL have a mayor elected by the KL citizens? Just like New York has the Mayor,Micheal Bloomberg?

Answer 1

Yes they should keep heritage at government cost. It is better that BN waste money on non-sense. any mayor should be elected by people because people trust him to deliver the job.

agian why wasting on MRR 2 ? they can use the money to protect/develop heritage into world class heritage and bring in tourist.

Answer 2

What good is infrastructure if we have lost our heritage ?   If we have lost our heritage, we have lost ourselves.... Infractructure shouls yake place around heritage, but not for its own sake....

A town's leader should rightly only

be elected by the towns' dwellers...and the person should only be a citizen of that town...

Answer 3

After BN dominance the country. They set up all kind of rule for they advantage only. The people can't choose their own mayor, because the BN can put their own people and gain their support during the party election. PLUS and others utilities companies are all the same.