Paradox: what is the nature of the elements of substance?

Question

Even if subatomic particles were composed of components which are components of other subatomic particles, it leaves the question of what are the components?

The organization of compounds, molecules, atoms, and subatomic particles are somewhat of a mystery.

Are the basic sub-atomic particles mearly components?

The idea of the most basic element of substance is paradoxical; but it does not seem to be able to be resolved if we theorize that particals exist as assembly of components; where each component can be a part of any number of subatomic particles, one at a time.

Answer 1

I think that when atoms are exploded which cause a nuclear reaction as in a nuclear bomb, you can see that sub-atomic particles have their origin in a type of energy that is so tremendous that it appears to be released from another dimension. So I think that what is creating sub-atomic particles is energy in another dimension that our plane of physical sciences and inquiry can't go into, except by transcending the barrier with consciousness on an individual basis, since consciousness is the only thing that is coming from beyond the physical universe and evidently from one's soul. Science will go on and on and on making discoveries about our physical universe, but they can't enter into the other dimension.

Answer 2

i think you misunderstood the intent of finding the elementary element. element doesn't mean atoms, it suppose to mean the irreducible constituents of things. if you can reduce something, you haven't found the elementary elements. current physics would tell you that the elements are the subatomic particles and attempts to analyze such particles is impossible. its nature is a blur.