Paul Burrell; will his books on Princess Diana be - well...brought to book at the High Court?

Question

Will he leave the courts with every populist newspaper hanging onto every word, or will someone come out of the shadows to test and try him, and as a result giving his books a going over...with perhaps the Private Eye and Have I Got News For You enough material to last them another ten years?

Answer 1

don't bother your little mind son, at the end of the day the royals always get away with murder, listen to the case but read between the lines for the truth?

Answer 2

I hope so. He is a prat of the first order. He's a good role model for kids though. 'Kids, this is what you don't want to grow up like'. I can't stand him.

Answer 3

Of course they will and hopefully exposed by the QC and ridiculed.  If that was Diana's only confidante I can only assume she was a very lonely person and then he goes on to profit from it and in America he lectures and designs china. What a wannnnniker.  No wonder he must be nervous and if he read all her letters as she wanted him to witness the brutality of the Royals, Prince Phillip in particular, he will be questioned about this till tears run down his face. I wish for the end of this tragic case as nothing which comes out of it will bring her back to her grieving sons who must be so cheesed off to say the least about reading wicked things about their mother.  As for Al Fayed, he can forget his British Passport now!!  This is all a farce, the car was being driven by a pisssed man running from the Paps, if there was a white car why has it never been found - because if it does exist/ed, altho' perfectly innocent would you come forward and admit to being responsible for two deaths.  This is the fatal flaw, because if it were not for that conundrum, there is no evidence to suggest that Prince Phillip, or secret services decided to kill her.  It will be interesting to hear about his vicious letters to Diana.  Private Eye will be rubbing their fingers.  But imagine if it could be proved = the mind boguls that is why it is so ridiculous..............Brought to book - neat.

Answer 4

I've just read the transcripts at http://www.scottbaker-inquests.gov/uk/ev...

He's going to be asked to clarify certain things of course.But,you must understand that each witness comes to the stand with their own perception or agenda of/on things.The lawyers are the same. So,anything said in court must be seen in that vein;somewhere in those words of witnesses the truth lies.Burrell wrote books and we all know pretty much what's been said.

Diana is a part of history,just like other members of the royal family(Victoria,Edward VII, Alexandra,Mary,the list goes on)there will be serious books written about them.Unfortunately for Diana,her life situation is also fodder for Private Eye,for the time being.

Answer 5

I think Burrell is a news-hungry git who isn't that trustworthy. Why is he, a decade after her death, still holding on to Diana's property? That rightly belongs to her sons. No, her dear confident is using it to make as much cash as he can off her.

That said, I do believe him about the sharp correspondence between the Princess and Prince Philip. And about the nasty conversations with her mother. People conveniently forget  that for much of Diana's life she and her mother never spoke. Before her marriage they hadn't spoken for 10 years! They made up so Francis could attend the wedding and avoid the awkward questions her absence would pose. Then they had more silences.

And for those who believed Diana was pregnant, well, you have the butler's words - she and Dodi had only been dating for a month. I doubt they slept together on the first date, and in this age I would expect the Princess who was an AIDS advocate to practice safe s*x, so those who think this was a conspiracy just lost their best arguments.

There is a theory that Dodi, not Diana, was the target of an attack because of his father's former business interests.

Answer 6

sorry...what was the question?

This was an emal i got from this person because i didnt agree with his point of view.

Message: Wan'ker...if you can't answer a question beyond your 'I don't watch telly, me' intellect, remain in your diseased cottage.

EDIT

and yet more bile from this person.

Message: ...the only reason why I don't go overboard is basically that I have more ******* important things to do...but as I have wrote before - if you havent got anything sensible to compose - id est; answer wise, keep it to yourself, moron

oh and more

Message: ...it was more a weak o****m, than a 'point of view'

Nice isnt it.

Answer 7

It is said the judge will be asking him about his claims and statements in his books tomorrow. We'll have to see! Have you upset 'razzle' naughty boy?

Answer 8

I don't trust Paul Burrell.  He seems more concerned about the spotlight and personal gain than truth.

best of luck to you!