Perhaps the Mc Canns and the Tapas 7 should give an exclusive interview to Sky or the BBC?

Question

Now the case in portugal has been shelved, the Mc Canns can gain access to the alledged case against them. Surely if they are innocent then there could be nothing better than to take to the air and sytematically disprove all the charges against them publicly. The advantage to this is that it then stops all the sniping and sniggering behind their backs. Yes?

Answer 1

The case has been shelved NOT dropped, the McScams should NEVER be given access to files as it may jepodise a future trial if evidence does come out that they are not as innocent as some believe

Answer 2

I don't reckon they'd get a million quid off the bbc or sky ;-) oprah all the way..!!!!

Answer 3

Now they have been cleared of any wrong doing they can get on with what they do best....Stocking up their bank account with donated funds.

Answer 4

The disadvantage regarding the mcCanns is they STILL haven't been charged with child neglect...

Answer 5

The police have already done this for them, why should they now have to go public and have to explain what the police have already done.? All they want to do now is keep looking for their missing daughter, something that most us us would also want to do.The sniggering will carry on no matter what they or anyone does or says, as have been already proved by some of tonight's questions.

Answer 6

why ar'nt they getting done for leaving the kids in the 1st place

Answer 7

If anything liker this happens to Anne S  wounder  how she will react ,if they have been arrogant in your words ,they had ever rights tobe  great they have been so strong Sorry too many trials by the media have done nothing for society at large but undermine law ...We all know folk will say or do anything to be on camera ...

Answer 8

As long as they don't get paid for it then yes. I would like them and their friends put on the spot regarding leaving young children alone while they are out enjoying themselves.

It really galls me that they have never had to answer the issue of child neglect. If that had been the child of a single mum from a council estate, the press and authorities would have pilloried the parent.

Answer 9

And what are they gonna say, "whoopee we did it". No purpose would be served by giving voice to people who should be done for child neglect at the very least.

Answer 10

i am quite sure they are discussing a fee and telling sky and the bbc what questions they will be answering

of course they could always use their stand in Clarance to speak for them as they look so shifty and arrogant

edit

colin so you agree they do look shifty then ? they are arrogant my brother saw them in portugal a few weeks after their daughter went missing , they swanned about dressed to the nines like superstars . how is that not arrogant

beleive me i would be thrown off yahoo if i really spoke my mind about hem two

Answer 11

They have already admitted that they neglected their children.However they and Mitchell try to wrap it up they will never be forgiven for that.

Answer 12

HI there MIdden.....The arguido status gave the McCanns lots of protection.....they could never answer questions because they were always bound by secrecy. Now that the status is lifted they will be free to answer all the unanswered Qs that any reporter throws at them .I won't hold my breath though.They will attend interviews on their terms and will continue only to answer pre scripted Q's.If they are so innocent and have nothing to hide why don't they now talk openly ?????? I hope that one day someone, somewhere spills the beans and the truth comes out because that poor child deserves better than this.

Oh, and Michael...they don't need to go searching for their daughter because they already know where she is !

Answer 13

Only if it pays enough

Answer 14

Yeah there is no secrecy law in place any more but the price will have to be right and even then we will get more erms and sighs and erm and blinks etc............ but no truth!!!