Please explain why global cooling can't be considered true in the short run but G.W. can be?

Question

According to all practical measurements global temperature actually dropped in 2007, and Global Warming 'scientists' claim that this means nothing, because short term trends don't matter, yet as late the late 90's there was a global cooling trend, but these new global warming scientists suddenly believe that their short term measurements matter. less than 10 years... and Global warming scientists think they are working with ancient data that proves their point. Pathetic. too bad this has become a political issue. What do you think, has global warming been studied nearly enough to prove that it exists because of man, and that it isn't just a cycle? Especially considering the cooling trend? look up 'global cooling 2007' if you want proof, I don't want you to think the one I pick is bias so do the research yourself if you care.

Answer 1

Here's the data:

http://www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/mailings/2...

The upward trend is 100+ years, and I sure don't see a cool 2007:

"The year 2007 tied for second warmest in the period of instrumental data, behind the record warmth of 2005"

Where did you get that crazy notion that there was a cooling trend into the late '90s?

Answer 2

d**n it man! Stop questioning the AGW agenda. We are the cause and all resistance is futile. Stop looking at th strong correlation between sun spots and the temperature. Ignore the historic temperatures and the medieval warm period. They are figments of your imagination. Little Ice Age? What little Ice age. Why would anyone expect or desire a warming from the past cold spell. And the last glaciation? Now you are making me mad! Why would we not want mile high glaciers in which to ski and sled ride? WHY I ASK?

Please repeat this mantra until you are once again part of the borg mind. "Al Gore is a genius. His film "The Inconvenient Truth" really is a documentary about or evil ways, and not a science fiction film containing 35 lies and half truths. The UK government did not really mean it when they said schools must disclose at least nine of these lies when discussing it in classes. Michael Mann is not really a scientific hack who fudged his data in order to erase the Medieval warm period and the little ice age. They did not exist except for a small 1 acre plot of land in rural old England. Remember, ice bergs only melt if warming is man made. They are resistant to all natural warming cycles. Polar bears are already dead. The "deniers" have strategically placed 25,000 robot ones to fool us. And finally, the UN's IPCC knows best. They only fudge their data in order to further our righteous cause. Do not read the scientific research, rely only on the Political summary."

This ends today's transmission. Please repeat this mantra until you can recite it to all heretics....I mean deniers. Do not argue the data, just repeat the mantra. Oh yea, and what ever you do, never acknowledge the hundreds of prominent scientists who doubt AGW. Mother Gaia knows that there is a consensus. And as soon as you know memorize the mantra you will to.

Answer 3

Well 2007 was the coolest since 2000, but the 16th warmest in the Century.  So it was not a cooling trend, it was a warming trend (and still is).

Answer 4

Here's why.  In the short run, other weather factors can overcome global warming for a while.  But those weather forces come and go, while global warming just chugs along.  Individual years may be unusually cool (weather opposes global warming), or unusually warm (weather INCREASES global warming).  1998 is the perfect example of that happening.

This is just one below average winter, which doesn't mean a thing.  It happened in 1982, 1991-1992, 1999-2000.  EVERY TIME global warming came back stronger than ever.  Proof.

http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/2007/

discussed in detail, with confirmation, at:

http://tamino.wordpress.com/2008/01/24/g...

As long as we keep making greenhouse gases in enormous amounts, global warming will dominate in the long run.  It's simple physics.

http://earthguide.ucsd.edu/earthguide/di...

The people who bring up Gore here are the "skeptics".  I don't bring him up.  I prefer to listen to the scientists.  They say global warming is real, and mostly caused by us.

Answer 5

ITS SIMPLE, GLOBAL WARMING IS A PLANNED ENIGMA BY 2 PARTS. ONE PART ON EARTH  GETTING EARTH READY FOR THE 2ND. PART BY GETTING RID OF ALL LIFE FOR A NEW SPECIE. THE 2ND. PART LOCATED BETWEEN 20 AND 22 YEARS FROM EARTH INCOMING. ALSO UNKNOWINGLY ON A COLLISION COURSE WITH HALEY'S COMET. THE FIRST PART IS UNDER OUR OCEAN USEING SOFISTICATED HIGHLY INTELLIGENT EQUIPTMENT TO WEAKEN THE INVISIBLE FORCE FIELD. TELL ME WHEN WAS THE LAST TIME YOU WENT SWIMMING IN THE MIDDLE OF THE BERMUDA TRIANGLE AND CAME BACK TO TELL ABOUT IT. IF THEIR WAS A DEEP FREEZE, THEN IT WOULD KILL THEM, SO NO DEEP FREEZE. IF MY FIRST STEP WAS USED THEN IT WOULD LOWER ALL THE OCEANS TO REVEAL ONE LOCATION, NOT THE REST, BUT IT WOULD SHOW CERTAIN LOCATIONS TO PLACE THE EXTRACTED MINERAL INWHICH WOULD DESTROY THEIR EQUIPTMENT AND AT THE SAME TIME ALLOW NATURE TO RETURN TO NORMAL NATURALLY. ONCE THE EQUIPTMENT IS DESTROYED NATURE WOULD FALL INTO PLACE AND THIS SPECIAL MINERAL WOULD DISRUPT ALL IMMENSELY. WHAT I SEE IS AIR BREATHERS. THATS WHY THEY NEED EARTH.. HAVENT YOU EVER HEARD OF FRESH AIR ON LAND WHILE A INVISABLE FORCE FIELD (LIKE THE OZONE) IN BETWEEN  OCEAN  AND FLOOR?