Question:

Please give me a valid argument about global warming.?

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

I am a awg. I beleive that global warming is natarul and that humans do not cause it. I have not yet seen one valid argument on yahoo answers that says it is real.( I have seen some that say it isn't). Please prove your points. No answers like it is or isn't please.

 Tags:

   Report

9 ANSWERS


  1. Just look at Gore ,even he does not believe in GW. You can tell by the way he lives. His hold movie was a lie...  


  2. That is a big ask, but since the vast majority of climate scientists have already done this for me, I really have no need.  Here is links to the places where you can read these, (if you are interested).

    http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=more...

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4495...

    http://www.ipcc.ch/

    http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/glob...


  3. Global warming is real and has been documented with ice cores dating back tens of thousands of years.

    What is NOT real is the quackery that humans caused (or can even affect) global warming.

    The scare tactics being perpetrated upon us are only a money/power grab scheme by bottom-feeder politicians accompanied by their so-easily-led sheeple who take their prattle, even their movies, as hard science

    .

    To find that my statement above is true, follow the money. See just who it is who will profit from the carbon offset, carbon tax, government subsidies for "wind farms", & etc.

    Here is truth about global warming:

    Global warming is one-half of the climatic cycle of warming and cooling.

    The earth's mean temperature cycles around the freezing point of water.

    This is a completely natural phenomenon which has been going on since there has been water on this planet. It is driven by the sun.

    Our planet is currently emerging from a 'mini ice age', so is

    becoming warmer and may return to the point at which Greenland is again usable as farmland (as it has been in recorded history).

    As the polar ice caps decrease, the amount of fresh water mixing with oceanic water will slow and perhaps stop the thermohaline cycle (the oceanic heat 'conveyor' which, among other things, keeps the U.S. east coast warm).

    When this cycle slows/stops, the planet will cool again and begin to enter another ice age.

    It's been happening for millions of years.

    The worrisome and brutal predictions of drastic climate effects are based on computer models, NOT CLIMATE HISTORY.

    As you probably know, computer models are not the most reliable of sources, especially when used to 'predict' chaotic systems such as weather.

    Global warming/cooling, AKA 'climate change':

    Humans did not cause it.

    Humans cannot stop it.  

  4. The people saying it isn't are generally looking at the slight decrease of the past 10 years.  However mainstream science is looking at about 3 millenia of data, so 10 samples, or 3,000, which is better?  If you can find anything that's suggesting more than 10 year old results against it, I'd love to see it.

    BTW, one of you other responders kept citing CO2, unfortunately, CO's the problem, if it were CO2, we'd all be dying everytime we exhaled.

  5. Global warming is completely natural. We humans are just adding to it. Have you not realized that there have been record-breaking temperatures all over the world? Or that more and more natural disasters appear each year?  

  6. I'm not going to try to prove it because I'm not a climatologist, but I say it doesn't matter.  Even if someone could conclusively prove that humans have no impact on global warming (and I'm not saying that's going to happen), I would still be just as strongly in favor of reducing emissions.  People have gotten so wrapped up in this silly political squabbling over global warming, they seem to have totally forgotten that we need air to breathe!  Some of our bigger cities are so polluted we have days when we're told to stay inside.  We need to reduce air pollution for the sake of our health if nothing else.

    If you need proof, see the links below.  These are just a few examples of the high pollution advisories we get here in the Phoenix area every year.  Your city may not be getting them yet, but it's only a matter of time if we don't do anything about it.

  7. Global Warming is real. It happens naturally yes, however, humans have introduced new pollutants that have sped up the cycle. We produce SO much CO2 that it is unprecedented. Try watching "An Inconvenient Truth" or anything on the Discovery Channel, Science Channel, National Geographic, etc...

  8. watch an inconvenient truth it explains everything and makes sense

  9. Well up until 1934-40 it was real and it happened because of the end of a period of low sun spot activity and the beginning of a more active period of solar output. It has been well proven now through current and historical records that the overall temperature average or climate of the earth is closely tied to the sun spot activity that directly affects the earth’s climate. Real global warming is a natural cosmic event, the global warming currently in the public spotlight is a fictional event brought about for political and economic gains by an elite group of con men.

    The whole concept that this global warming scam is built on comes from a mistake in logic by a chemist back in the late 1800s when things started warming up at the end of the 2nd half of the little ice age. His arguments were adopted by a group of anti-industrial/anti-technology religious fanatics known as Luddites after their prophet to try and return society to its grander days in the early medieval period when nobility meant something. Oh yes, just like today the major adherents of this cult were the 2nd and 3rd sons of the minor nobility and in some cases the 1st sons who had squandered their inheritances on life style instead of productivity.

    The anti Co2 cult was enhanced again when the argument was taken up during the late 20s when warming became noticeable and a industrial chemical firm had come up with a fluorocarbon instead of an oxycarbon refrigerant they claimed was not only superior to Co2 as a refrigerant it also would end the threat of global warming caused by Co2. This refrigerant was known as Freon and was in recent years banned because it was suspected of damaging the ozone layer. Now because of the low performance of other substituted refrigerants Co2 is making a huge comeback in the refrigeration industry, especially in newer auto air-conditioning systems that are more compact and efficient.

    In the 1970s the Co2 equals warming theory was once again brought forward by a couple of low end climate scientists Mann/Hansen to first warn of the immanent plunge into a new and disastrous ice age because of the production of Co2 by vehicles and industry. This even though it got major media news play flopped like a lead balloon. Then they got involved with a shyster politician that had major oil company connections dating back to his fathers involvement with them who said clearly people are not afraid of cold but they are of heat.

    So this politician writes a disaster is coming because of the warming that will be caused by the huge amounts of Co2 the world is pumping into the air. Mann/Hansen then revised their materials to forecast ever rising temperatures in sync with rising Co2 levels. Well when they checked closely they found that world temperatures had no relationship with Co2 levels and instead followed sun spot activity so they had to alter world temperature records to reflect a temperature increase matching the Co2 increase. This worked fine up through 2000 because things were warming up after the 70s cool period at that time. Then after 2000 temps leveled off and started dropping a little and their altered temperature curve that matched the increasing Co2 curve began to radically separate from reality even more than it had from the beginning of the scam when they had interjected an artificial .5C jump that placed the current 1998 peak well above 1934 when it was actually about .1C below 1934. This radical difference between actual recorded temperatures and reported ones quoted by Mann/Hansen is what brought about NASA action to review national and international records. The US national records have been repaired and now reflect the fact that global warming is more than a myth, it is an outright con game played for profit at the highest political and economic levels.

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 9 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.