Question:

Pro Life Persons?

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

What is worse?

A: Aborted fetuses

B. Abused and Unwanted Children

Why?

 Tags:

   Report

21 ANSWERS


  1. Both.  Their both kinda the same thing aren't they?

    FYI: I'm aware of the scientific data to justify abortion, but I don't care about it myself.  I don't need anymore e-mails.


  2. Aborted fetus is worse.

    Abused and unwanted children still have their life.  Abused and unwanted children still have a chance for a better life.

    An aborted fetus lost its life for the convenience of some other persons (mother or father or both) in more than 80% of the cases.  In 10% of the cases, it was medical necessity and it's mother life would have been lost, this is a sad story and nothing can be done about it.  In about 10% of the cases, the fetus it self would have perished.  The rest of the cases of abortion is UNWANTED termination of life and any move to keep this as an unquestionable right should be ABORTED.

  3. B. definitely.

    Also somewhat bored of the thickos posting: "abortion is murder". In their theological world maybe.

    edit - No David C, the number of children conceived and the number of couples looking to adopt does not match, at all.

    edit - Thumb me down half-wits, if it makes you feel better.

  4. Luckily, in the real world those aren't the only options.

    There's also C: Increased support for pregnant women and children in crisis situations, and better education to reduce the causes of unplanned pregnancy.

    Also, if you have any statistical evidence that child abuse has been reduced over the last 40 years since Roe vs. Wade, I'd be very interested to see it. Until then, I'll stand by my belief that abortion covers up problems rather than solves them :)

  5. B.

    Oh wait - you said pro-life. Oops! Pro-choice here!

  6. An aborted fetus is worse.

    In both cases the parent is committing a crime, however since abortion is murder the penalty is more severe than child endangering.

  7. In real life the answer is B. In a theoretical response the answer could be A.

    In theory the aborted fetus could've been a child destined to cure cancer, or bring world peace, or make a difference in the lives of abused or unwanted children.  The truth of the matter is we will never know what the unborn fetus could have produced in life but IF it were to do something great for the larger part of society then the greater good out weighs the suffering of the abused and unwanted.  Remember that is a philosophical response.

    The truth is the aborted fetus is not self aware and doesn't know it is being aborted.  It feels no pain and the only damage possible is to the potential mother.  Physical and psychological effects can haunt women.

    Abused and neglected children is a one of the worst crimes of humanity.  They are self aware and they do feel pain unlike the fetus.  The feelings they have can be overwhelming and mess with their minds forever.  External wounds can heal but sometimes the internal scarring of not be wanted or being abused can last a lifetime.  Living is often harder than dying and that's why people call suicide the easy way out.

    In the end I think it is simple, the pain a child feels when they are abused and unwanted is greater then never knowing about your existence.

  8. a

    because the second the child isconcepted its alive and abortion is killing it.

    you see the abuse will end when they grow but death is eternal

  9. B.

    Studies have shown that, abused children are more likely to grow up as child abusers themselves, the cycle is very hard to break.

  10. This is not a real choice. Both are wrong. You are trying to fog the issue. Unwanted children can be adopted by people who do want them.

  11. B, but i'm pro choice anyways.

  12. Both

  13. I think they're both irresponsible. If more people focused as much of their attention on safer s*x practices as they do on this ridiculous topic, there wouldn't be a problem.

  14. If a person chooses A then they are not sane by anyone's standards.

  15. B. Children feel pain and they cry, fetuses dont feel anything, and they dont cry.

  16. Well considering that abortion is murder, then I'd have to go with abortion being worst. At least the abused and unwanted children can grow up and make a difference in the world.

    EDIT: Hey, Bunniebaby, you're immature. I just read you message you sent me. I'd rather be dumb than immature any day. Have a GREAT day!:)

  17. They are two separate issues. I refuse to pick "the lesser of two evils".

  18. Dear lady you have a valid point there and i agree that aborted fetuses or a womans right to abortion is justified here.

    But how about when both parties involved are capable of raising a faimly yet the man doesent want the child.

    How do you justify no say for a man because he forgot to use a condom but has to pay for it?????

  19. lol this is so transparent.

    A. they have no oppitunity to affect their world or change what happens

    note stop trying to make a bad point, just because you want an abortion doesnt mean the child will be abused or made to feel unwanted

  20. Option C.  People who are pro-abortion pretending to be pro-choicers and will find any excuse to abort a fetus.

    And yes, fetus's can and do cry later on in the pregnancy.  It has been proven on ultrasounds.

    BS Fatty Bumba.  Don't assume that all abused children grow up abusing their own kids.  Some do break out of the mold and swear never to let their kids go through what they went through themselves.

  21. Are we to assume that only unplanned children are abused and unwanted?
You're reading: Pro Life Persons?

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 21 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.
Unanswered Questions