Question:

Prove that the real number 0 does not have a reciprocal.?

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

(Hint: Assume b=1 over 0 is the reciprocal of 0. Supply a reason for each of the following steps.

1=0 * 1 over 0 as in 1/0.

=0*b

=0

 Tags:

   Report

4 ANSWERS


  1. Any real number times its reciprocal equals 1.

    Ex:

    2 * 1/2 = 1

    However: 0 * 1/0 = 0, and therefore, it has no reciprocal.


  2. In order for 0 to have a reciprocal, there must exist a

    number b such that b =1/0 and

    0*b = 1

    Now

    let us suppose this number exists.  

    then 1 = 0(1/0)=0(b) by the definition of the reciprocal.

    --------------------------------------...

    Definition of reciprocal of a number h

    If h is a number the definition of the reciprocal of h is

    the number that can be multiplied by h to give us 1, the

    identity number for multiplication

    --------------------------------------...

    Since 1=0*b

    we  have

    0*b = 0   since 0 times any number equals 0.   0 is the

    identity number for addition and

    0*(any integer) = 0+0+0.....+0 that number of times

    and that is zero since 0 is identity for addition.

    Moreover 0 divided by any nonzero number is 0 so

    0*(any rational number) is 0

    Thus 0*b =0

    We therefore have

    1=0*(1/0)=0*b=0  by the transitive property of equality

    Consequently 1=0.

    But this says the identity number for multiplication is

    equal to the identity number for addition.   That is a contradiction to the axiom that the real numbers must have a

    unique multiplicative identity that is different from the additive identity.    In common sense terms, we know

    1 does not equal zero and it would have to, if 0 had a reciprocal.    This contradiction provides your proof, by

    contradiction that 0 does not have a reciprocal.  

      I suspect what I've written need a little cleaning up and formatting to fit the forms of the axiums and theorems you

    have learned up to date but this should be the structure for your proof


  3. I think you more or less got it right.

    Assume 0 has a reciprocal x

    Then

    x * 0 = 1

    0 = 1

    This is a contradiction, therefore our initial assumption is wrong.

    So there is no x that is a reciprocal of 0

    Proof by contradiction is actually used quite frequently in math.

  4. Since the reciprocal function is defined as:

    f(x) = 1/x

    If x = 0, you're dividing by zero, which is undefined.

    Another way to look at the defintion is:

    The reciprocal of x is the number that when multiplied to x is 1.

    if x = 0, there is no number that can cause this to become a 1 when multiplied.

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 4 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.