Question:

Psychiatrist concludes that today's self-harmful liberalism is a mental disorder. Agree?

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

Top psychiatrist concludes liberals clinically nuts

Eminent psychiatrist makes case ideology is mental disorder

WASHINGTON – Just when liberals thought it was safe to start identifying themselves as such, an acclaimed psychiatrist is making the case that the ideology motivating them is actually a mental disorder.

"Based on strikingly irrational beliefs and emotions, modern liberals relentlessly undermine the most important principles on which our freedoms were founded," says Dr. Lyle Rossiter, author of the new book, "The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness." "Like spoiled, angry children, they rebel against the normal responsibilities of adulthood and demand that a parental government meet their needs from cradle to grave."

While political activists on the other side of the spectrum have made similar observations, Rossiter boasts professional credentials and a life virtually free of activism and links to "the vast right-wing conspiracy."

For more than 35 years he has diagnosed and treated more than 1,500 patients as a board-certified clinical psychiatrist and examined more than 2,700 civil and criminal cases as a board-certified forensic psychiatrist. He received his medical and psychiatric training at the University of Chicago.

Rossiter says the kind of liberalism being displayed by the two major candidates for the Democratic Party presidential nomination can only be understood as a psychological disorder.

"A social scientist who understands human nature will not dismiss the vital roles of free choice, voluntary cooperation and moral integrity – as liberals do," he says. "A political leader who understands human nature will not ignore individual differences in talent, drive, personal appeal and work ethic, and then try to impose economic and social equality on the population – as liberals do. And a legislator who understands human nature will not create an environment of rules which over-regulates and over-taxes the nation's citizens, corrupts their character and reduces them to wards of the state – as liberals do."

Dr. Rossiter says the liberal agenda preys on weakness and feelings of inferiority in the population by:

 creating and reinforcing perceptions of victimization;

 satisfying infantile claims to entitlement, indulgence and compensation;

 augmenting primitive feelings of envy;

 rejecting the sovereignty of the individual, subordinating him to the will of the government.

"The roots of liberalism – and its associated madness – can be clearly identified by understanding how children develop from infancy to adulthood and how distorted development produces the irrational beliefs of the liberal mind," he says. "When the modern liberal mind whines about imaginary victims, rages against imaginary villains and seeks above all else to run the lives of persons competent to run their own lives, the neurosis of the liberal mind becomes painfully obvious."

 Tags:

   Report

4 ANSWERS


  1. Scientists have also  found that liberals tolerate ambiguity and conflict better than conservatives because of how their brains work.  They also found that conservatives tend to be more structured and persistent in their judgments whereas liberals are more open to new experiences.


  2. Some aspects of their philosophies are heavily abberrated and some aren't - but I would not hesitate to say the EXACT SAME THING about the "conservatives".

    It almost seems, at times, as if both parties got together a long time ago and came up with a compromise something like this:

    "We'll be right on issues 1, 3 and 5 and wrong on issues 2, 4 and 6.  And you guys can be right about issues 2, 4 and 6 and wrong on issues 1, 3 and 5.  That way, we'll cover all the bases and maintain a workable balance of power between us."

    BOTH sides are after the same thing - the increase of governmental power and control over the lives of the individual citizens and the diminishing of personal freedom.

    The only differeence is that they are going about it in two different ways.  (Probably a massive "social experiment" to see which one works better - as I suspect the "Cold War" of capitalism vs communism was.)

    Say, for instance, that both sides want to do away with a particular freedom ....

    The conservative power brokers will attack it directly - openly seeking legislation against it.

    The liberal power brokers will publically defend it and covertly encourage absurd, harmful and extreme abuses of it - refusing to allow sensible controls on the exercise of it (as a "matter of fair principal") - in the hope that the people will ultimately get fed-up enough to voluntarily give it up, themselves.

    Though I dislike both sides about equally, I would consider the liberals to be far more dangerous - just because they do it all so covertly, and trick their everyday, street-level supporters into thinking they are defending freedom when, instead, they are enthusiastically aiding and abetting the carefully planned destruction of it.

    Granted - theirs is the longer road to this insidious goal because they start out in the opposite direction and only double back when they are out of common sight, while the conservatives head straight-on for it, not caring who sees what they are doing.

    Logically, one would think that this would place the liberals further away from their reprehensible mutual goal than ithe conservatives, but that is not the case.  Though theirs is the longer route, the liberals are travelling it at the speed of a AA fuel dragster(!) while the conservatives are making headway at the speed of an arthritic snail.  Which, if you stop to really think about it, is probably why the liberal philosophies are being so deeply ingrained into and heavily promoted by the mass media - they are proving to be vastly more successful!

  3. No

  4. He's one out of thousands of doctors who could say the same about the Republicans. So what one person thinks about a group of people does not influence me because I know that it's their opinion and not fact.  Come to me with several others saying the same thing and I might listen.  But while it's only one persons opinion what's to listen to.  I know psychologist and psychiatrist and social workers who feel the same thing about republicans.

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 4 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.
Unanswered Questions