Question about tennis? It's a question for Federer and Nadal fans?

Question

Why when Nadal loses in the tournament first, then Federer does or vice versa? The only time I see that when Nadal loses first, and Federer goes on to win the tournament is the U.S. Open. I have never seen Nadal that when Federer loses the tournament first, Nadal goes on to win the tournament. It's like Nadal and Federer's fans are in a spell. We have to admit is that both are great players. Nadal is king of clay, but Federer is #1 in the world. I hate people say Federer still has mono. Respect him my god. Whenever tennis players get big wins over Federer or Nadal, then they lose in the next round to someone who they are not suppose to lose to. So we call them retards. Tsonga for example wanted to prove he can beat Nadal again in Indian Wells and failed. He's fake. If let's Marcos Baghdatis and Tsonga would have won Australia, then I wouldn't say it's fake because Rod Laver did it one time and was unseeded and a new player and he wasn't fake. Therefore, Nadal and Federer is in a spell.

Answer 1

We don't know if mono is affecting him or not. Its impossible to say, but please look it up in a medical site, and realize that most players who have had it took leave of absences for 6 months. It stays in your system for a year or more!!! So, I am wishing it on all those who are thinking its just a flu. I don't know if it is why Federer is playing bad or not, but definitely you could see it at Indian Wells, and a bit at Miami.

Other than that, he just didn't play better than Stepanek, but don't forget Step is very good on clay.  

I'm not too sure what you mean by Nadal and Federer being in a spell? I think they both have moved on in their thoughts to the next event by now.

Answer 2

Nadal will lose and federer will always win soon. just wait.

Answer 3

Gianfi,

You rambled on just enough to get me confused.  Who is it you think is fake?   Sometimes players have good days...sometimes bad.   I just know that Federer and Nadal are REALLY GREAT and I am a fan.

Answer 4

no.. its just this week in rome there many ups and downs , twists and turns! :) see, wawrinka and stepanek is still alive... reaching SF... if they both win their SF matches, its very very crazy in Rome! :)

Answer 5

Uh, you're so wrong.  2005 Monte Carlo, Federer loses to Gasquet in the QF, Nadal wins the title.  2007 Indian Wells, Federer loses in the 2nd round to Canas, Nadal wins the title.  2007 Rome, Federer loses 3rd round to Volandri, Nadal wins the title.  Get your facts straight first.

Answer 6

what c**p... aussie open 2007 nadal lost in qtrs, fed won aussie open.

us open 2005 and 2006, blake and youzhny respectively took out rafa, fed won.

us open 2007 ... ferrer took out rafa, fed won.

All other tournies in which rafa and fed didn't meet and fed won, those tournies also your logic doesn't apply and there are dozens of them trust me.

where from do u come up with all this?

Answer 7

Well its certainly been a crazy week here in Rome. Who would have thought the two favourites for the final be knocked out! Who do you think will win it now ?

i agree with you pixeeee

Answer 8

Gianfi...speak English? Very confusing o_0