Quick Fantasy Football Question!!!

Question

If you are in a league (with standard scoring) and you had a UTIL (utility spot) which can be occupied by any position; QB, RB, WR, TE, D/ST, or a K. What position would it be?

A QB right? They score more points than other players of different positions drafted in proximity to them. Any stories from experience would be appreciated, thanx.

Answer 1

Wow, I've only seen the Util spot for baseball and basketball...but yeah, the two QB scenario would be nice... my leagues only show a slot for WR/RB, so if you can slide any player into a "util" spot, make it a QB, unless its Ryan Leaf...LOL

Answer 2

Depends what QB were talking about.  I would have some recievers and running backs ranked higher than some quarterbacks.  In most cases I would have a quarterback but I would not hesitate to start a RB/WR instead of a QB.

Answer 3

most likely QB.  I'm not sure how your scoring system is set, but in my league, Matt Hasselbeck (decent QB) had 231 points, only 4 less than Adrian Petersen (top 2 RB).  7 of the top ten scorers were QBs.  If your league counts return yards and TDs for defense you might want to look for a defense as an alternative.

Answer 4

I agree on the QB thing,print this web sites' 2008 over all projected stats/$$$ values for a quick/free cheatsheet..(It's nice because it also projects total fantsy points for the year.)~~~G{}{}d Luck!

http://www.fantasysportscentral.com

Answer 5

join my free yahoo fantasy football league Monroe Ballas (ID# 272887) password: monroe

Answer 6

its kind of a best available situation.  But yes most likely you would go with 2 qbs.  In fact in a league like this drafting 2 solid qbs early is a must as thats gonna give you a leg up, especially if qbs are getting 6 point for passing td.