Question:

Rabbits vs Chooks. no 40/20?

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

Can anyone please explain to me why there was no 40/20 awarded to souths in the last minute of the game last night. harrigan stuffed up I think. What do you think? The chooks were nearly plucked

 Tags:

   Report

8 ANSWERS


  1. Unfortunately, some teams always get the close decisions  in  games. The teams are normally Melbourne, Manly and Easts. We come to expect this.


  2. I agree that it was a40/20 also that at least 2easts tries where scored from forward passes,harrigan must have had his head up his **** not to see it.

  3. Yeah they never showed the angle from the sideline but from what they did show it was definitely a 40/20. Sandow did a top job pulling that off and was sooo unlucky not to be awarded with it. I reckon they could have done it in the last 10 seconds, but oh well they arent my team so I dont mind, but big call

  4. 40/20 for sure just look at where sandow kicked the ball and how far away from the 20 it bounced work it out but the chickens have been buying games for 100 years

  5. yes i reckon it was a 40/20 and it did cost them the game, sandow would have been spewing the touch judge wasnt even confident on making the call he stood with one leg on each side of the 20m line.

    i think the commentators said it the rabbits were the only team playing the second half and i reckon they deserved the win

  6. maybe it is another conspiracy to get souths out of the league LOL

    Go Broncos!!!


  7. its not like it cost them the game...if fitzy kicks a few more goals, the rabbits dont even get close!

  8. because it wasent

    souths are c**p and didnt deserve to win

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 8 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.
Unanswered Questions