Rafidaa ! Why Ali (RA) gave pledge Alligiance to first three caliphs ?If they were so bad as u claim ?

Question

According to u he was an Infallible Imam,Aponted buy Allah ,he should have declare jihad against those illegal caliphs.

Answer 1

The rafidaah dogs have no answers for these type of questions. They will be in the worst h**l.

Ali (RA) is just a man and taking him to be god is an unforgivable sin.

May Allah be pleased with all the companions of the Prophet (S.A.W.)

Answer 2

because he was not a rafidah himself, and he never called himself shiaa or anything else besides Muslim.

@aRia.R

and of course that's according to ayatolla didntGotoSchoolTani?

Answer 3

because its was first years of islamic government so that his holiness didnt declare jihad against them in order to save islam. Because it would start a war between muslims and weaken them from inside.

But their behavior and their deeds made it clear to people that they are illegal. Because 1 - They all (all of those illegal caliphs) devolved their works to him and always get help from him. 2 - In the time that they arrogated lady fatima's (PBUH) garden that was given to him by her honorable father Muhammad (PBUH), Imam Ali (PBUH) and Lady Fatima (PBUH) did lots of things to make it clear to people that those caliphs are not legal. The garden was just captured by his holiness Ali (AS) and his holiness Muhammad (SA), not by muslim soldiers, so that it was their own right to claim it. and then caliphs made the spurious hadith "PROPHETS DONT DEVISE" and said that its not your right.

and more important of that THEY TOLD THEM TO PREPARE TWO TESTIMONIAL", they said this two people that their infallibility is said in Quran itslef. and the rest of this story is a proof for the question that you asked.

But the unity of muslims had preference, so that they kept quiet.

but they have said that We dont say anything as long as its JUST our right that is not given to us, but when it is the people's right that is not paid attention, we wouldn't keep quiet. And they didn't do NOTHING, with their words they tried to make people aware of these things, BUT the people that listened to them were low, the beauty of this world didnt let them to listen to words of wisdom and truth.

Answer 4

Abu bakar, Omer Farooq , Usman  number of times said i would die if Ali Did not help me.

that statement is clearly showing the powers of Ali .

you are talking about Caliph

CALIPHS are servents of People like Ali .

Ali(A.S) could fight for each  and every thing . but he didn't there for fighter for his own . He fights for Allah subha-nu-tallah .

they have spent there whole live to spread Islam . they didn't not fight to non muslims for collecting taxes . they spread peace so every one accepts Islam Like Prophet did in his era .

Islam Is about peace not for position and status

Don't you know about Karbala . what message you assumes from that?

and Yeah I'm talking about Ali he is King Of heavens

Answer 5

Not only was he respective towards all 3 caliphs,amazing is that whenever they claim something like Umar(R.A) burnt the house of Fatima(R.A),

Where was Ali(R.A) at that time??

Are they trying to prove that the 2nd caliph was a cruel man and the 4th caliph was a coward???

May Allah Guide Them,,,

Peace Be Upon All 4 Caliphs...

Answer my question:-

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;...

Answer 6

who break unity??????????????????

i or u . i said اشهدالله لا اله الا الله  then how u allow ur self call me Rafidda??????

if u make mistake abt shia then how u will answer abt this libel in Qyamah?

Answer 7

aRia.R is right, and we are not talkiong ill, just the true history of Islam. Thank you aRia.R Busted again Nasabi

Answer 8

jihad is not the only way to spread islam  

Answer 9

What Do Scholars of Ahl us-Sunnah in the Past and Present say about Shia (Rafidah)? :

1) Imam Ash-Shafi'i: On one occasion Imam Shafi'i said concerning the Shia,

"I have not seen among the heretics a people more famous for falsehood than the Raafidi* Shia." and on another occasion he said; "Narrate knowledge from everyone you meet except for the raafidi* Shia, because they invent ahadith and adopt them as part of their religion." (Minhaj as-Sunnah an-Nabawiyyah) *

(Some shia at the time of the Alid Imam Zayd ibn 'Ali demanded that he make a declaration of innocence (tabarra) from whoever disagreed with 'Ali's right to be Imam. When Zayd refused, they rejected him, and became known as the "raafida" or rejectors. Those who followed Imam Zayd became known as Zaydis, and have very little difference from mainstream Islam. The Raafidi evolved into the the various Imami shia sects, the largest of which is the Ithna 'Ashari.)

2) Imam Abu Hanifah: It is reported that often Imam Abu Hanifah used to repeat the following statement about the raafidi Shia; "Whoever doubts whether they are disbelievers has himself committed disbelief."

3) Imam Malik: Once when asked about the raafidi Shia, Imam Malik said; "Do not speak to them or narrate from them, for surely they are liars." During one of Imam Malik's classes, it was mentioned that the raafidi Shia curse the sahaba. Imam Malik recited the verse, "Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah and those with him are harsh with the disbelievers and gentle among themselves. So that the disbelievers may become enraged with them." (48:29) He then said, "Whoever becomes enraged when the sahaba are mentioned is the one about whom the verse speaks." (Tafseer al-Qurtubi)

4) Abu Zur'ah ar-Razi: He said of the raafidi Shia doctrine of cursing the sahaba, "If you see someone degrade any of the companions of the ProphetSAWS know that he is a disbeliever. Because the ProphetSAWS was real, what he brought was the truth and all of it was conveyed to us by way of the sahaba. What those disbelievers wish to do is cast doubt on the reliability of our narrators in order to invalidate the Qur'an and Sunnah. Thus the disbelievers are the ones most deserving of defamation."

5) Ibn Hazm al-Andalusi: During the period of Muslim rule in Spain, Imam Abu Muhammad ibn Hazm would often debate with the Catholic priests about their religious texts. He brought before them evidence of textual distortions in the Bible and the loss of the original manuscripts. When they replied by pointing out the Shia claims that the Qur'an has been distorted and altered, Ibn Hazm informed them that Shia claims were not valid evidence because the shia were not themselves muslims.

6) Imam Al-Alusi: He declared the raafidi Shia disbelievers because of their defamation of the sahaba. His position was based on the rulings of Imam Malik and other scholars. In response to their claim to be followers of the Ahl al-Bayt (the Prophet'sSAWS family) Al-Alusi said, "No, they are really followers of the devils and the Ahl al-Bayt are innocent of them."

7) Muhammad Rasheed Rida: This scholar was among those who worked sincerely for rapproachment between the shia and the sunni, and they in turn pretended moderation for his benefit. However, in the midst of his efforts, they caught him by surprise by presenting him with a number of their books which slander Islam. He then replied in a paper called As-Sunnah wa Ash-Shia in which he exposed their false doctrines and idolatrous practices.

8) Dr. Hilali: After living close to the shia for some years, the famous Moroccan scholar, Dr. Hilali wrote a paper on them in which he declared them to be disbelievers.

9) Abul-A'la Maududi: This great Pakistani scholar wrote an introduction to the book, "Ar-Riddah bain al-Ams wa al-Yaum" In it was written, regarding the Imami Ja'fari Shia, "despite their moderate views (relative to other shia sects), they are swimming in disbelief like white bloodcells in blood or like fish in water."

10) among the other contemporary scholars who have expressed similar views are: Sheikh Abdul 'Aziz ibn Baz, Sheikh Nassiraddin Al-Albani, Allama Ash-Shanqiti, Sheikh An-Nashashibi, Imam Ahmad Ameen, and Dr. Rashaad Salim.

Answer 10

according to the shia the prophet asked Ali to take over after his death which is so very not true. the prophet asked abu baker to lead the hajj and even when he was ill he asked abu baker to lead the salah and was displeased when he heard the voice of omer when he was  leading the salah. this is clear that abu baker was supposed to be the leader after the prophet. if the prophet asked Ali to lead i don't understand why Ali disobeyed the rasool. he would be the last person to disobey Allah and his messenger and now he did. why??? he would be ready to die as a shaheed. why did he not fight. did he think that the word of rasoolullah is of less value that he ignored?? NO!!! he would never do that. so this is clear proof that Ali was not supposed to come after the rasoolullah cuz he did not fight to obey the prophet.

Ali remained silent for the sake of the ommah???? was he ready to disobey the commands of the prophet just to keep the ommah united??? RUBBISH.

@ the user above me: niether u nor i break the ommah. it's shytaan who breaks the omma.