Rank these fighters from best to worst?

Question

ricardo mayorga

de la hoya

tito trinidad

Answer 1

MICKY WARD

Answer 2

They are all common opponents for each other. Mayorga lost to both and Tito beat both. I think Oscar was a better boxer, while Tito was the ideal fighter while Ricardo had a harder punch. I think worst doesn't really count in this case but who has the edge over the others and given my liitle write up above, here's my one to three:

Tito

Oscar

Ricky

Answer 3

I wish they'd all retire instead of milking their fans for every last penny on meaningless fights.

But yeah, Golden Boy, Tito and then Mayorga way behind.  

Answer 4

You could make an argument for either Tito or Oscar in the top spot, though I'm inclined to give it to De La Hoya because he's fought and been competitive at the top level of the sport for much longer than Trinidad was able to. Also, I think Oscar won their fight, which was probably the only time in his career that a close decision didn't go his way (and maybe the second Mosely fight).

But there can be no arguing that Mayorga is the worst of the three, by a lot.

Answer 5

Are you asking over their careers or right now?  

Felix Tito Trinidad

Oscar De La Hoya

Ricardo Mayorga

Oscar is overrated but he is better than Mayorga.

Answer 6

1) De la Hoya - really beat Trinidad.  And destroyed Mayorga.  Won titles in mutliple weight classes.  And fought at the highest level of competition for the longest time.

2) Trinidad - beat Mayorga.  Was awesome in his prime.  But once people figured out his weaknesses, he became a good but not great fighter.

3) Mayorga - really just a crude slugger but is good at goading opponents and making exciting fights.

Answer 7

1) De La Hoya --He completely dominated Trinidad in 8 of 12 rounds.  The score should have been 116-112 for Oscar. The fight was scored **BY THE ROUND**, not by whether or not he should have fought differently the last four rounds.

2) Trinidad

3) Mayorga

Answer 8

Tito trinidad

Oscar Delahoya

Ricardo Mayorga

Answer 9

Trinidad beat DeLa Hoya and Oscar beat Mayorga so Trinidad is better than the other two

Answer 10

thumbs up to tornado ~ oscar, tito, then mayorga

Answer 11

de la hoya

tito trinadad

ricardo mayorga

Answer 12

i would have to say

de la hoya

ricardo mayorga

tito trinidad

they are all pretty good but i think

aleksandr povetkin would give it to them all...

Answer 13

I co-sign with Tornado and for the same reason.

Answer 14

1, Felix Trinidad

2, Oscar De La Hoya

3, Ricardo Mayorga

Tito and Oscar are both fighters that are now tarnishing their great careers by fighting on just for the lure of big money. Both are big favourites of mine and two of the most entertaining fighters i have ever seen and both multiple weight world champs who will both be hall of famers shortly after their retirements, i just about favour Tito but that is just down to personal preference i used to love Titos style of fighting and to say people worked him out would be wrong he only started losing when he moved up to Middle and only against greats like Hopkins, Winky and recently Jones Jr, Tito to me is one of the best Welterweights of all time and beat some truly great fighters along the way. It would be like people saying Roberto Duran was found out at Middleweight but in truth we all know he was a Lightweight who only moved up to make big fights just like Tito did.

Mayorga isnt a future Hall of famer and is a very distant third to the two great boxers you mentioned. Mayorga has more of a reputation for his trash talking than he does for his fighting skills nowadays.

Answer 15

this list is retarded. you pulled these fighters out of your ***!

best - oscar, trinidad, mayorga