Question:

Rate My Fantasy Football Team (10 points for best answer)?

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

QB Drew Brees/David Garrard/Kurt Warner

RB Steven Jackson/Matt Forte/Deuce Mcallister

WR Larry Fitzgerald/Torry Holt/Roddy White/Jerry Porter/Bernard Berrian/Isaac Bruce

TE Kellen Winslow/Benjamin Watson

DEF/ST Chicago Bears

K Robbie Gould

I just need some more depth at running back which will be accomplished by trading Garrard imo

Rate from 1-10 with explanation plz

 Tags:

   Report

6 ANSWERS


  1. not bad at the QB but pretty weak at the RB since jackson is waiting a new contract still and mccallister is doing split time with bush. good group of WR. all are experienced and u know what ur getting with them. TE is basic they do the catching so u cant lose there and ur defense is a solid defense that is healthy so far and a kicker is just a kicker.

    i give u a 7 maybe a 8. the only thing bringing u down is the RB b/c that is a crucial part of fantasy football  


  2. Well i had drew brees a few years ago in my draft when he first came in with New Orleans. Its a solid QB pick, he has some really good recievers in Marques Colston(underrated WR), and Devery henderson. Steven Jackson is prob the 3rd best RB to LT and Adrian Peterson, because they have no passing game so they run it. The question is your WR. Fitzgerald is in an offense that may have Matt Leinart as their starter, and he is shaky so Fitzgerald might not get a lot of points, Torry Holt is old and the others are who?. The TE is solid. Kellen Winslow is prob one of the top TE in the game. Chicago D is a questionable pick. They used to be solid, but with age becoming a huge factor it could wind up hurting you. Robbie Gould i had 2 years ago as well. He gave me about 10 points a week, and thats because the bears can drive, but cant finish. So he is always kicking 3 point fg's which helps out in fantasy. I wouldnt trade Garrard, maybe cause im an ECU pirate myself, but he also is on a playoff team. They got rid of leftwich for a reason. This guy can run that offense, and the jags are now always in the mix for a playoff berth, i would look into getting rid of Kurt Warner, because around week 3 or 4 im sure the cardinals will be 1-3 or 0-4 and they will just put Leinart in to get more NFL experience. Deuce is questionable. If healthy he can add a bunch of points because he is more of a powerback and will get more of the Red Zone Touchdowns than reggie. But he is never healthy.

  3. QB: Solid

    RB: Weak

    WR: Weak - White?(who's throwing to him?) Porter? Berrian? (again) I don't think Holt and Bruce will be #1's either

    TE: Solid

    DEF: Solid

    K: Fine

    6 - You need help at WR and RB both. Better pull off a miracle trade....

    Unless you've got more than 12 teams in your league....

  4. I'll give it a 6. You need a better RB like LaDainian Tomlinson and a better QB like Tom Brady.

  5. QB - Brees is a great stat producer for fantasy. He will do well for you.

    Garrard is a very good back up. He doesn't get a lot of stats, but he doesn't make many mistakes either. Which is what you need during Brees bye week.

    Warner has just been announced as the starter in Arizona, so he will be a great stat producer again this year.

    RB - Steven Jackson is a great fantasy RB, he is in the top 5.

    Forte is unproven. He is a gamble, and hopefully he pays off for you, but watch him closely.

    McAllister's knees are shot. He won't last long before he is injured again. Be ready to dump him.

    WR - Fitzgerald is a top 5 WR, great pick.

    Holt will also be a good pick up for you, he is consistant and practically the only passing game the Rams have.

    I am not sold on Roddy White just yet. Atlanta is a mess on both sides of the ball. He may be the best WR on the Falcons, but that isn't really saying much.

    Porter has been hurt and still is nursing his injury. (Hamstring)

    He has missed all of training camp and has yet to practice. He is a very risky guy to have taking up a roster spot. Sounds like he won't even play the first game.

    Berrian has a chance to produce, but the problem is he is on a running offense and won't get many balls thrown his way. I don't see much production from him fantasy wise.

    Bruce has faded away the last few years and is not the WR he used to be. His fantasy value is really not much. He may prove me wrong in San Francisco with the new offense, but I doubt it.

    TE - Winslow is a great pick, he is high scoring and consistant.

    Watson doesn't do much. They have too many other people to throw to in New England.

    DEF - Chicago defense is very good as usual.

    So, honestly, I see you struggling each week. Your QB, 1 RB and 2 WRs will score most of your points.

    I have to give you a 6 on this one.

    Good luck.


  6. No offense or anything but I have always wondered, what is the point of Fantasy Football anyway?

    Not trying to be rude at all.

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 6 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.
Unanswered Questions