Rate all the trades 1-10?

Question

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=49~336~3401~2172~2494~3034~2760~1024&teams=11~11~11~21~11~11~21~5&te=&cash=

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=1705~851~1767~813~3241&teams=3~3~27~27~27&te=&cash=

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=1017~515&teams=7~18&te=&cash=

i like the 3rd one a lot because Denver gets a defender,

and New York gets someone who can play the style the Knicks wanna play next year: run and gun

but rate all 1-10

Answer 1

1st-5-well granger is thier franchise player right now..and trading tinsley wont hurt that bad since they now have tj ford but, granger will probably end up being better than all of them. so i give a 5 for the first one for gettin lebron help.

2nd-6-its about even i guess.doubt the hornets would do it they dont need etan ,julian wright showed flashes in the playoffs,peja is good from about anywhere on the court when hes on,rasual is a solid bench player and they really dont need to do this trade at all

3rd-1- zach cannot keep up with the nuggets fast paced game. hes a half court player. not to mention hes  areliable double double guy and kenyon has yet to prove hes fully returned from his injury. the knicks rather not exchange a 3 year contract for another since they want to be in the lebron james sweepstakes in 2010.

Answer 2

1st- 3.0

2nd-6.0

3rd-2.0

Answer 3

1st 4

2nd 7

3rd 1

1st. Pacers won't do it

2nd wizards too many shooters but i think Peja bring in some consistent

3rd. Well....3 ball stopper in 1 team?????Zach's defence is bad too

Answer 4

1

4

7

Answer 5

the 1st i will give like a 2.5 because what if the suns get into foul trouble then they wouldn't have as much better bench players to come and back up.

the 2nd one iw ill give a 4.5 caron butler,david west,tyson chandler,and chris paul there are too much high scorers

then the bench player might not get any points

the 3rd i give 7.0 it alright

Answer 6

1=6

2=7

3=10

Answer 7

First trade: 6. I like Tinsley in Cleveland. But I doubt Indiana is willing to trade Tinsley and Granger and in return get those players? I don't think so.

Second trade: 4. Caron Butler for Peja Stojakovic as the main deal breaker? That alone looks impossible to me. Wizards won't trade Butler for Peja.

Third trade: 8. This could go either way. I really like the idea though.

Answer 8

first trade - 1

second trade - 6 actually not too bad

third trade - 8

Answer 9

Wow!!!  First two trades are awful both getting a one from me.  The third trade is basically exchanging one overpaid defense-challeged player for another.  Allow me to elaborate.

Trade 1: No way Ind. trades Granger for Grant Hill and chump change

Trade 2: No way Wash trades their best overall player Caron Butler for Peja and chump change.

Trade 3: Let's see Randolph can play offense but can't defend where you already have two players who dominate the scoring and the ball (Melo, AI) and the knicks get a player who can't score off a set play and gets his points mostly off put backs or alley-oops and is at best a solid help defender and they both make almost max money when the Knicks are clearly trying to clear space for Lebron or Dwayne Wade. not a good deal.  A three at best only because I'd like to see who on Denver would pout first about not getting enought touches Melo or Randolph?  AI isn't going to pout too much since he's the pg on Denver aand will always get his shots asince he has to set up the offense but then again it's AI he's gonna pout about something sooner or later.