Rate/fix my blue eyes yugioh deck?

Question

MONSTERS

Blue-eyes ultimate dragon

Blue-eyes shinning dragon

X3Blue-eyes white dragon

The light hex-sealed fusion

White horned dragon

X3 luster dragon

Paldin of white dragon

Masked dragon

Luster dragon #2

Armed dragon lv3

Armed dragon lv5

Armed dragon lv7

X3 lord of D.

X2kaiser sea horse

X2 spirit caller

X2 masked dragon

Flame ruler

Tyrant dragon

Horus lv6

Spine hunter

Twin headed behemoth

Decoy dragon

SPELLS

Axe of despair

Heavy storm

Monster reborn

Lighting vortex

Poison of the old man

Polmerization

Emergency provisions

re- fusion

Fusion weapon

x2 the flute of summoning dragon

Lv modulation

White dragon ritual

A wingbeat of giant dragon

TRAPS

bottomlessTrap Hole

Waboku

Draining Shields

Magic cylinder

Ordal of a traveller

trap hole

Sakurestsu armor

Answer 1

Monsters: 23

3 Blue-Eyes White Dragon

1 Blue-Eyes Shining Dragon

2 Cyber Dragon

2 Luster Dragon (1900 ATK)

1 Kaiser Seahorse

2 Mirage Dragon

1 Snipe Hunter

1 Twin-Headed Behemoth

2 Masked Dragon

2 Lord of D.

1 The Dark - Hex-Sealed Fusion

1 The Light - Hex-Sealed Fusion

1 Kaibaman

1 Morphing Jar

1 Spirit Reaper

1 Decoy Dragon

Spells: 13

2 Dragon's Mirror

1 Polymerization

2 Hand Destruction

1 Lightning Vortex

1 Heavy Storm

1 Mystical Space Typhoon

1 Monster Reborn

1 Premature Burial

1 Brain Control

2 Enemy Controller

Traps: 6

1 Torrential Tribute

1 Birthright

2 Sakuretsu Armor

2 Bottomless Trap Hole

Total: 42 cards

Fusion Deck: 6

2 Five-Headed Dragon

2 Blue-Eyes Ultimate Dragon

2 King Dragun

Answer 2

Yu Gi Oh is old, play something else

Answer 3

I would suggest that you totally take out the armed dragons, poison of the old man, ordeal (not guaranteed) and toss in a premature burial, mirror force, swords of revealing light.

Building a deck around blue eyes is rather difficult and not worth it since he lacks an effect, unlike horus (a good combo for horus is royal decree) or armed dragon. Consider building a deck around one of them instead.