Record # of attacks during Clinton admin, only 1 (planned under clinton) during Bush term, yet...?

Question

libs try to claim we're less safe now. Do they know how stupid they sound?

Answer 1

They do not.

5 Under Clinton & the planning of 9-11. I need not mention them, only uniformed people like Obama would want that info.

Answer 2

Actually the claim that we are less safe now is made by several Federal Agencies and Intelligence, including the National Threat Assessment.

You actually are the one who sounds stupid, since you aren't in the CIA, NSA or FBI, but refute their claims that terrorists are spreading cells all over the world, thanks to their training on US troops in Iraq,

Answer 3

If they knew how stupid they sound all the time they'd go crawl in a corner hiding in shame! But they don't so they keep on. Anyways I don't know if they don't want to acknowledge this truth but they best wake up and smell the coffee as a number of them actually wanted to put the Clintons back in the office.  

Answer 4

They seem to be lacking in intelligence when they talk like that.

Answer 5

And what was the name of the memo the Bush administration had...

Oh yea Bin "Laden determined to attack inside the U.S."

Good work Bushy

Answer 6

And you are saying that none of the attacks during the clinton administration were planned under the first Bush's administration?

I think that is rather naive of you.

People like that will hate America regardless of who is in power.

NOW we are less safe because we have gotten entire countries on our bad side, not just radicals.  

Answer 7

Our previous policies of no effective response to the radicals' terror and murder arguably led to the events of 9/11.

Why some would want to revert back to these policies is simply amazing.