Are turks from mongolia?

Question

I read that turks are mongolians respectively huns. Is that correct?

Answer 1

They are the decendents.  

Answer 2

No they are not.  A Turk is "a native or national of Turkey, or a person of Turkish descent. "

Answer 3

No, Mongolians are.

Answer 4

No they don't have any relation to Mongolians have u ever seen a turkish person they are a mix between white and arabic.

Answer 5

The term Turk refers to people of Turkic origins (not only Turkish from Turkey but also Kazakhs, Uzbeks, Kyrgyz, Uyghur, Azerbaijani, Turkmen) who origially migrated from their original land in western and central Mongolia. But they are not Mongols or Mongolians. Mongols or Mongolians came to modern day Mongolia later in history, and are ethnically, culturally, linguistically, and genetically distinct from Turkic people.

Answer 6

Turks, Mongols and Chinese r oldest ppl of central asia,

Turks r not mongolian, Mongolians r not Turk but Turks and Mongalians lived as step tribes and they had a lot partnerships.

Chinese and Mongolians got more powerfull than Turks and Turks started to migrate west like Huns. Hun rulers were Turkic but hun ppl were mix of different nations

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkic_migr...  

Answer 7

You're right.

But, there were only relates in languages. Their DNA was never been in studies yet.

Their both languages are in the same group of Altaic dialect

As Hun's are from northern China. Their conquer expedition leads them to central Europe. But before the conquer Europe, there were trace of them attacking central and minor Asia (Turkey now).

Probably the Altaic languages spreads to Korea, whilst the Mongol occupation. I don't have data.



View believes that the descendant of the Hun was Bulgarian.  

The Hungarian believes them self to be the Hun.

Unless we found some tomb with corpses that prove to be definite Huns. And took the sample to compare the DNA, there would be no answers yet.