I know baby food is meant for babies,... duh, but is it really necessary if the child will eat regular table food without any problem? He doesn't choke, doesn't get constipated (unless he eats cheese), and is growing like a weed. My father-in-law insists that baby food has more vitamins and is all around better for babies than regular table food, but isn't baby food just an over-cooked, pureed, and watered-down bunch of unflavored vegetables? I know the longer you cook veggies the less vitamins are actually left intact, so isn't that the case here? He's also worried about my son eating meats, how he can't chew them so they sit in his tummy. Well, I only give him small peices (and he's seen this too) and he grinds it up pretty well with his little gums. I've had him on regular food since about 7 or 8 months because every meal time was a battle. He HATED his baby food, but loved adult food. Why not feed the kid what he wants rather than forcing the baby food down his throat. When they tried giving him baby food one time, his diaper stunk up the entire house, literally, and he had a diaper rash soon after he pooped. That sounds to me like his tummy isn't liking what we're feeding him, but my father-in-law says that's normal. I know babies are supposed to stink, but not that bad. What do yall think?
Tags: