Did anyone else notice this?

Question

Ok is it just me or is wikipedia's articles about wrestling PPVs starting to sound more biased and critical. Here is an example, this is the article for Unforgiven:

"As of August 26, 2008, five professional wrestling matches are scheduled to be featured on the event's card. These matches are planned with predetermined outcomes by WWE's creative staff and feature wrestlers playing a character for the entertainment of the audience. All wrestlers will be from either the Raw, SmackDown, or ECW brands - the three storyline divisions in which WWE assigns its employees"

Now dont call me a "f*g" or tell me to "get over it". I dont really care all that much but I just thought it is something worth sharing.

Answer 1

yes

Answer 2

no, i don't think biased is the right word to describe it ' coz they're (the writer/s of the said stipulation in wiki) just being brutally honest about it.. though the term critical is suitable..

Answer 3

In all fairness, what they said is exactly what's going on... They're just explaining it as if you've never even heard of the concept of wrestling...

Answer 4

YEAH WIKIPEIAD WANTS TO BE MORE SERIOUS THAN EVER