Question:

Didak will or should be sacked

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

is he still under club sanction from last year....

 Tags:

   Report

10 ANSWERS


  1. Collingwood wont sack anyone good enough to get a game with them.

    They gloss over misbehaviour now, yesterday, tomorrow, whenever!

    They are the biggest mob of hypocrites in the country - headed by big-mouth Eddie.


  2. I dont know if he should be sacked but he certainly lacks intergrity right now. I think that Collingwood need to find a new way to deal with rogue players because whatever they are doing doesnt appear to be working. I think that the incident over the weekend is an indication as to why the Pies have lacked form on the ground in the last couple of weeks. They need to get their minds back to the footy and out of the gutter.

  3. Untouchable. Second only to JC.

    Methinks everyone wants Didak sacked so they can pick him up.     No bl00dy way.     And what was his crime?

  4. **If Collingwood decides not to get rid of Didak (which I think they will)they will need to impose a very harsh penalty to try and send the right message to him and all the other players in the team.

    Didak has clearly lied to the club from the President down to the players.  That in itself is wrong and you'd think he'd at least be smart enough to know that he's going to get caught out.**

  5. Didak wont be sacked by Collingwood.

    Over the years the club has not dealt with transgressing players - they just try & cover up as much as they can.

    Eddie will do a bit of bleating & chest banging & hope things die down. Didak will continue acting like a pratt - as he has done since he first appeared on the scene.

  6. I think Collingwood should and will sack Didak, he hasn't learned a great deal has he? Like it or not he is a Collingwood footballer and everything he does is scrutinised by the media and public, it comes with the territory and the big bucks!!. You can't educate MUGS

  7. The thing is, Collingwood have taken away the bahavioural conditions from his contract, so I don't know if they can sack him based on an off field misdemenour. I know what Didak did was wrong, but Heath Shaw is the one we should be talking about, not Didak.

    I have to agree with Macca on this one, and not because I'm biased. Heater and Dids are both d**ckheads, and what they did was very disappointing.

  8. Didak re-negotiated his contract a few weeks ago.  The new contract removed the penalty clauses for bad behaviour.

    I personally would just let Didak finish this season then dump him or trade him.

  9. It seems that he's signed a restriction free contract recently

    So what reason can Didak be sack with?

    Exactly what did Didak do?

    He could have been just as drunk as Heater when he got into the car. He could have been asleep in the car.

    Bottom line is Heater started the car and drove home - so why should Didak be punished for anything?

    .

  10. Didak should definatley be given the flick given his previous stuff ups. But you can bet London to a brick, the Pies will be soft and just fine and or suspend him. The guy is not dealing with a full deck but he can play good patchy footy and that is all that will matter in the end.

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 10 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.
Unanswered Questions