Evolution: upgrade or degrade?

Question

Lower species to higher species or Higher species to lower species?

Less intelligent to highly intelligent or highly intelligent to less intelligent?

The evolution as proposed by Charles Darwin seems to be unacceptable to me. Australopithecus to Homo Sapiens Sapiens?

It's like in the beginning, the whole world was in order and everything was peaceful, almost no vices, people lived for hundred thousand years, very civilized and highly intelligent people. Then, vices are introduced, civilization starts to degrade, people lived for shorter period. Then, later on, people are in to vices and sinful activities, short period of time, degraded civilization, then people bacame lesser intelligent.

Now, at this time, people have a very degraded civilization, heads of states are not righteous, people live for a very short period of time, very sinful. People abort innocent children, same s*x relationships, too much disorder, people are small and rare are healthy. People are very forgetful.

The prediction in Srimad-Bhagavatam seems that it would really happen. People will grow very short, no higher than 3 feet..?(not sure if it's 3 feet..) Very short life span.

As atomic bombs, sun's UV rays, nuclear weapons and radioactive waste(from nuclear plants) were created, the radiation that it gives of are so strong that the people who received it would not grow any longer and their life span would become very short. As we all know, this radiation is cancerous. So, what do you think?

If you believe in the fossils, well, what if those who were buried were just the outcasts of the society million years ago and those who were in the higher class of society were cremated due to religious reasons and beliefs? That their belongings were also burned with their bodies?

And the other belongings were in the depths of the oceans due to the current of the water?

i'm 13 and I strongly disagree with Darwin's theory of evolution.

If you believe in that lower to higher evolution, well, that should be on the spiritual aspect. The soul transports from lower species to higher species until it reaches this human body.

Answer 1

Neither.  Evolution doesn't include a concept of progress or degeneration or of the development of "higher" or "lower" levels although more complex may be explained as a way of refining the adaptability and increase the survival rate.

From an evolutionary view humans are not a "higher" species.  A difficult concept for people who believe they were created in the image of God to handle.

Random mutations don't constitute a design or plan.

Answer 2

Evolution does not require faith, only evidence.

The evidence exists objectively regardless of its palate and your particular tastes with regards to acceptable.

Its predictions have been empirically observed, it is a theory in the same since that relativity is a theory.

That is to say that the predictions of this theory now exists as observational and objective facts.

This will remain so, evolution will not go away it will only continue to be revised.

Further people are actually getting taller on average as far as historical statics are concerned and smarter at least in terms of IQ test quantification.

Answer 3

evolution is silly, just silly rabbits that like to eat whale mungus, I tell you it is slothy and sourpundling bulony booya

Answer 4

...im going surfing...wave goes up and i slide down...now thats progress...