Girls and guys. TESTICLES ?

Question

We know guys have them. Do guys like them? Do females have an advantage of not having them? What is your opinion?

Answer 1

Who would want balls?  It surprises me that men are better jumpers cause you'd think they'd catch on everything.  But apparently not.  I'm glad guys seem to like them, anyway  :-)

Answer 2

of course not they hurt like h**l and girls always kick us in the balls

ouuuuch  

Answer 3

I would hate having balls.  Together with the p***s, they make for a very ugly genital region.  I'm not even a L*****n, I just prefer the nice compact look of the female genitals.

Answer 4

Well you certainly got my attention.

I'm glad I don't have any - sounds like they get hurt easily.

Answer 5

Men have up to 70 times more testosterone because of them.

They protect us from many things, including osteoporosis.

Answer 6

I have become rather fond of mine. They have served me well over the years. On a list of body parts to be given up, they would certainly not be close to the top.  

Answer 7

A guy would rather be hit anywhere else than in the balls!

They're extremely delicate and fragile and dangle unprotected in a thin pouch.

If impacted, they cause excruciating, incapacitating pain that can make a guy double over and fall to the ground in agony.

When running naked, especially in hot weather when the s*****m hangs low,  the p***s flops back and forth onto them causing pain. So, they definitely need some kind of artificial support.

If naked in a jungle, they're subject to animal attacks, accidental hits, targeted by angry, pissed-off females, etc.

Testicles outside the body would appear to be a flaw in nature.

Can't understand why evolution didn't provide more protection for the balls!

Since they're strictly reproductive organs, if it wasn't for the existence of the female s*x, a guy wouldn't have them!

So, women are the cause of BALLS, and all the pain and pleasure associated with them !!!

Answer 8

My opinion is this:  Testes are critical to the production of testosterone and spermatozoa, i.e. the substrate for life.  I like my testes because they may or may not produce life.  The zona fasciculata produces something on the order of 50 times less androgen than the male, i.e. perhaps 20-40 pg/dL max.

Females would not benefit by having testes, sertoli cells, Leydig cells as they would inherently lead to enhancement of secondary male features.  Parthenogenesis hasn't been around for quite some time and auto-fertilization would likely be in contradiction to natural order.

At present, it is difficult or impossible to find a surgeon to even attempt this procedure as it really serves no practical purpose.  It cannot even be justified cosmetically.

Answer 9

Yeah i like them its like have 2 old friends growing up with you and i love it when women play with them ;)

But i hate it when i get a soccer ball right in the testicles and i go down like a sack of potatoes and cant get up for about 3 mins  

Answer 10

women do have advantage of not having them because that way they don't know how being hit in the balls will feel like.

Answer 11

The only disadvantage is they hang out in harms way.

But I know a guy in New Jersey that likes it that way.

Answer 12

Males are female version 2.1.  Male testicles are modified ovaries that have because of the blessings of God and nature, descended to perform a different task.  I cannot say if there is a distinct advantage to possessing testicles vs. not having them, you may need to ask a eunuch that question, that is an answer that females are not equipped to provide.