Hypothetical Question?

Question

Suppose Federation never happened in Australia and as such Australia is still under British rule. Suppose Britain started to feel sorry for the Gypsies, as they were targeted by the n***s, and felt that the Gypsies needed a homeland. Britain then decided to give a piece of Australia to the Gypsies. A piece of Australia at the expense of 750,000. 750,000 people who as a result of this would be forced into refugee camps and poverty.

Would you support this? Under these circumstances should Australians fight for their land or happily trot off to a refugee camp?

Answer 1

I agree, the Palestinians should not have been displaced in favor of a Jewish homeland and I don't blame them for not accepting being "given" half the territory that was already theirs.

Oh wait...that was a hypothetical question, never mind.

Answer 2

I think they deserve Texas.

Answer 3

more than 750,000 original Australians have already been displaced - so what Australians are you talking about?     And that is not hypothetical.      The Gypsy race definitely needed a homeland, we race of spiritual people find our homes in all countries - we do not have to be 'granted' these homelands.    You - should study your history.

Before you go talking about being a refugee, recognise first the people you have already made refugees in your own country.