Important fast wrestling question?

Question

in his prime michaels could take down everyone in the wrestling world

his stamina his power his agility and passion his strength his ability could win it aginst evryone austin wouldnt even come close to beating him at 2m 14 if michaels didnt have his back hurt and gave his best stone cold would even behere, he started the new generation and the attitude era hes the one that saved the wwe when hogan left and then he strted the era in survivor series 1997 that would destory wcw he is the best and not even naithch could beat him give your opinion please be nice hbk is the best

Answer 1

along with Diesel (kevin Nash) and bret Hart as one of the lowest drawing

champions of all time to...

Why do you think he's only had it once in the last 5 years??

i still think he is one of the best, behind naitch, Rock and Austin...

FxxK Hogan tho

Answer 2

As a Shawn Michaels fan, I admit he had flaws back in the years. He was an all rounded type of wrestler and a phenomenal in ring performer. When the wrestlers started jumping ship to WCW, Shawn Michaels was one of the few to carry out WWF at the time. Then when the wars came in, Shawn Michaels did start up the new generation and era of wrestling, along the help of other wrestlers as well. He's had a lot of memorable matches and I can start from the first match I've seen him in, which was at Royal Rumble 1993: Shawn Michaels vs. Marty Jannetty. As a Shawn Michaels and wrestling fan, I can't take anything away from Flair, Hogan, or Austin. I have the up most respect for each individual and all the wrestlers who made wrestling what it is today.

Answer 3

The Attitude era was because of HBK.  The D-X angle with him, HHH, and Chyna paved the road that the Rock, Stone Cold, and Mankind traveled.

Answer 4

He is one of the best

Answer 5

I agree!!He is the best!!

Answer 6

Shawn Michaels is the BEST d**n WRESTLER EVER!!!

Answer 7

HBK is a god in my eyes, but let's get a few things straightened out. Though I know I'll probably get as many thumbs down as Lou J, because people don't like listening to facts and reason all that often.

HBK was a backstage politician, which is why he held on to the belt for so long. He didn't want to drop the belt to Austin, he just wanted to vacate it and then leave, but that plan was stopped when Undertaker began taping his fist at a meeting and threatened to beat HBK to a pulp if HBK didn't agree to job to Austin in the next ten seconds. So that's why HBK ended up jobbing to Austin.

It's ridiculous, utterly and completely ridiculous, to say that Austin wouldn't even be here. Also, Austin destroyed WCW. Sorry, but HBK and Vince s******g over Bret had very little to do with WCW's downfall.

What wouldn't Naitch beat him at? Wrestling is scripted. If it was in the 80s, Naitch would be scripted to win, while HBK would be scripted to win in the 90s. Ric Flair carried a company like no other, and HBK's reign in the mid-90s will never come close to what Flair did in the NWA. End of discussion.

Oh, and during HBK's prime, there were two men known as Mitsuharu Misawa and Kenta Kobashi who were arguably the greatest wrestlers of the modern era. HBK, as good as he was and still is, did not touch them.

Anyway, starred. I want to see how many people recognise the words you speak as being inaccurate, instead of blindly agreeing with you because they're HBK fans.