Is telekinesis true or not?

Question

if its true please tell me how

Answer 1

Goodness.  What a load of weird answers.

The truth is that there is no credible evidence whatsoever for any form of telekinesis.  No-one has ever been able to demonstrate telekinetic abilites.  The James Randi organization has an open offer of one million dollars for anyone who is able to do so.  Plus, any telekinetic abilities at all would violate several basic laws of physics.

But, hey, if you want to believe in it, it's a free country.  Many adults believe in fairies, after all.

.

.

Answer 2

Not,if it were it wouldn't be a secret.By the way Mr Angel is a magician.He has no special powers.

Answer 3

I think it is. My Mom and grandmother clain my greatgrand father could make the table shake accross the room.

Answer 4

Telekinesis (TK) is now called Psychokinesis (PK) in the scientific research literature. Evidence for PK has been collected and established since the 1930's when it was first studied in a scientific manner by J. B. Rhine.

I have included links for you below so you can read up on the actual research.

Despite claims that no one has ever demonstrated PK it has been demonstrated by thousands of people during thousands of experiments (many repeated) at statistically significant levels.

Also, please note the debunkers have to chage the argument to it has never been conclusively demonstrated I agree and note that nothing else in science has ever met the conclusive criteria either.

While this work certainly has critics most of them fail to get published in peer reviewed science journals where the original research is published.

Lack of qualifications to get published and/or laziness in not submitting a rebuttal does not make your criticism recognized but publication in a peer reviewed science journal does.

Also, despite misinformation frequently posted on YA peer review panels do not simply publish articles because they think they are interesting (though it is true they don't have to agree with the conclusions although the research shows that panelist that agree with the conclusion vote for publication and those that do not vote for not publishing in the vast majority of the cases) any publication submitted is judged on methodology and several other criteria (varies by journal) in general bad science (poor methods, bad statistics, etc.) does not make it into Nature, Science, Lancet, or any other peer reviewed science journals as this would make the journal, the supporting organization and the reviewers look less than professional.

Answer 5

watch this and you answer the question:

http://www.sortlifeout.co.uk/Telekinesis...

read as much as you can find - there is plenty of literature, but i doubt any will actually teach you how to do it.

simple things are the hardest to explain.

read, read and read, but only to increase your confidence it is possible.

and practice. the simple way:

see the object lifting/moving. this is all: you just have to actually see it moving. and it will.

if mountains were moved - they called it 'faith' -, you can move smallest things.

good luck.

http://www.sortlifeout.co.uk/telekinesis...

Answer 6

Yes, I Can Use It.

I Can Move A Rubber Band Like A millimeter..

Not Much.. But, Is Hard.

Answer 7

If you want to believe it then sure. I'm kinda wondering what parapsycology is doing under science and mathematics since it is clearly neither.

Answer 8

Short answer: it's very unlikely

Slightly longer answer:

Despite that some may claim that PK was demonstrated by "thousands of people during thousands of experiments" at statistically significant levels, the truth is that no one has ever conclusively demonstrated PK. In fact, the evidence that does exist is debatable at best, and the aforementioned experimental studies are almost universally criticized or ignored as pathological science by degreed scientists. Some may also claim that critics have "failed" to get their critiques published, but this is just blatant lying. Scientific journals usually aren't the place for bickering, and if paranormal journals are even open to skeptic submissions, it's not likely that a scientist is going to want to publish in a pseudoscience  journal. It's not that critics have tried and failed. It's impossible to know that unless you're on the peer review board of every journal. Rather, I believe that it's just that they haven't bothered, and for good reason.

Check out the following links for more info. Every link will include links to the original sources. You'll find tons of interesting information, but ultimately it will be disappointing if you were hoping to develop telekinetic powers.

Answer 9

I think it is true. it's all about focus and mind control and only people who have it can use it. Like criss angel and 100's of other people who have this gift. I dont really think you can learn it, it must be a gift to you.

Answer 10

it's not proven so no one can answer that.( it's just a theory but i think it can be true)